DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gutierrez v. Columbia Casualty Co., 100 So. 2d 537.

15 citing documents.

  • Gibson v. Barmore 134 So. 3d 1229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    (Orl.App.1958); (La.App.
  • Taylor v. Chism 660 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    (Orl.App.1958); (La.App.
  • Migues v. Hebert 640 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    (Orl.App.1958); (La.App.
  • Valin v. Barnes 550 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • Davis v. Galilee Baptist Church 486 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    (Orl.App.1958); (La.App.
  • Harless v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. 164 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    E 2 as follows: “The driver of a vehicle entering a public highway from a private road * * * shall yield the right of way to all vehicles approaching on the public highway * * This Court held in Gutierrez v. Columbia Casualty Co., La.App., (quoting from page 540) in a case involving this question: * * * “Of course, the rationale of the foregoing statute may not be interpreted to mean that a motorist may, in the face of imminent danger, simply rely upon the right of way accorded him by law and re
  • Garcia v. Anchor Casualty Company 148 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    App., ; Johnson v. Whitfield, La.App., ; Gutierrez v. Columbia Casualty Co., La.App., ."
  • Vidrine v. Simoneaux 145 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
  • Margiotta v. Bankers Fire & Marine Insurance 144 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    * * * >» In the case of Gutierrez v. Columbia Casualty Company, La.App., Orleans, 1958, , the Court stated: “Of course, the rationale of the foregoing statute may not be interpreted to mean that a motorist may, in the face of imminent danger, simply rely upon the right of way accorded him by law and recklessly drive along the highway ■ with complete abandonment of all caution, but it does mean that
  • Holland v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 131 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    This principle is recognized by the Court in the case of Gutierrez v. Columbia Casualty Company, La.App.Orleans, 1958, , where the Court states: "Of course, the rationale of the foregoing statute may not be interpreted to mean that a motorist may, in the face of imminent danger, simply rely upon the right of way accorded him by law and recklessly drive along the highway with complete abandonment of all caution, but it does mean t
  • Haslett v. Hingle 130 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Co. v. Great American Indemnity Company, La.App., ; Gutierrez v. Columbia Casualty Co., La.App., ; Gautreaux v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Co., La.
  • Josey v. Granite State Fire Insurance Company 122 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
  • Allen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 120 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
  • Smith v. Hoye 115 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    Gutierrez v. Columbia Casualty Company, La.App.1958, .
  • Travelers Insurance Co. v. Great American Indem. Co. 113 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    In the recent case of Gutierrez v. Columbia Casualty Co., La.App., , the Orleans Circuit with Judge Regan as the organ of the court involving a case under LSA-R.S.