State of Louisiana Versus John W. Patton
State of Louisiana Versus John W. Patton, No. 21-KA-613 (La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. Nov. 17, 2021).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Johnson 128 So. 3d 325
- State v. Calloway 271 So. 3d 349
- State v. Victor 167 So. 3d 118
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 21-KA-613
VERSUS FIFTH CIRCUIT
JOHN W. PATTON COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF LOUISIANA
ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA
NO. 18-7474, DIVISION "J"
HONORABLE STEPHEN C. GREFER, JUDGE PRESIDING
November 17, 2021
MARC E. JOHNSON
JUDGE
Panel composed of Judges Jude G. Gravois,
Marc E. Johnson, and Stephen J. Windhorst
SENTENCES VACATED;
REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING
MEJ
JGG
SJW
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT,
JOHN W. PATTON
Prentice L. White
JOHNSON, J.
Defendant, John W. Patton, appeals his convictions and sentences for
attempted second degree rape, false imprisonment while armed with a dangerous
weapon, second degree rape, and sexual battery from the 24th Judicial District
Court, Division, “J”. For the following reasons, we vacate Defendant’s sentences
and remand the matter to the trial court for resentencing.
On November 30, 2018, Defendant was charged with attempted second
degree rape (count one), in violation of La. R.S. 14:27 and La. R.S. 14:42.1; false
imprisonment while armed with a dangerous weapon (count two), in violation of
La. R.S. 14:46.1; second degree rape (count three), in violation of La. R.S. 14:42.1;
and sexual battery (count four), in violation of La. R.S. 14:43.1. Defendant
pleaded not guilty to the charged offenses.
Trial commenced before a 12-person jury on April 12, 2021. After eight
days, the jury unanimously found Defendant guilty on all four counts. On May 6,
2021, Defendant filed a “Motion for New Trial,” which was denied by the trial
court on May 14, 2021. On May 19, 2021, Defendant was sentenced to 15 years
imprisonment on count one, 10 years imprisonment on count two, 35 years
imprisonment without the benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence
on count three, and 10 years imprisonment without the benefit of parole, probation,
or suspension of sentence on count four. The trial court ordered that all the
sentences be served at hard labor, and that counts two, three, and four be
concurrently served “with one another” and consecutively served to count one.
Defendant filed a “Motion for Appeal,”1 which was granted by the trial court
on May 14, 2021. The motion for appeal was granted prior to Defendant’s
sentencing on May 19, 2021. Defendant’s appeal was lodged with this Court on
September 21, 2021.
1
Defendant filed the motion for appeal on May 7, 2021.
21-KA-613 1
Pursuant to La. C.Cr.P. art. 916, a trial court is divested of jurisdiction, and
the jurisdiction of the appellate court attaches upon the granting a defendant’s
motion for appeal. When issues raised on appeal involve actions taken by the trial
court after it was divested of jurisdiction, the appropriate action is to vacate those
actions and remand the matter. See, State v. Johnson, 13-75 (La. App 5 Cir.
10/9/13); 128 So.3d 325, 329. Once a trial court is divested of jurisdiction, it may
only take certain specified actions. See, La. C.Cr.P. art. 916. Imposing a sentence
for an underlying offense is not included in the list of specified actions in La.
C.Cr.P. art. 916.
In State v. Calloway, 18-708 (La. App. 5 Cir. 4/24/19); 271 So.3d 349, the
defendant sought review of his consecutive sentences for second degree murder
and obstruction of justice. This Court noted that in State v. Victor, 13-888 (La.
App. 5 Cir. 12/23/14); 167 So.3d 118, it had found the trial court’s imposition of
sentence after it was divested of jurisdiction was harmless error, after specifically
noting that the defendant did not raise any sentencing issues on appeal. However,
unlike in Victor, this Court vacated the defendant’s sentences for his second degree
murder and obstruction of justice convictions and remanded the matter for
resentencing, after finding that the trial court was divested of jurisdiction upon
granting the motion for appeal and that the only assignments of error that the
defendant raised involved sentencing issues. Id. at 352.
In the present case, upon granting Defendant’s motion for appeal on May 14,
2021, the trial court was divested of jurisdiction to subsequently sentence
Defendant on May 19, 2021. Therefore, we find that the motion for appeal was
prematurely granted before sentencing. Accordingly, we vacate Defendant’s
sentences for attempted second degree rape (count one), false imprisonment while
armed with a dangerous weapon (count two), second degree rape (count three), and
21-KA-613 2
sexual battery (count four), and remand the matter to the trial court for
resentencing.
SENTENCES VACATED;
REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING
21-KA-613 3
SUSAN M. CHEHARDY CURTIS B. PURSELL
CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT
NANCY F. VEGA
FREDERICKA H. WICKER
CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK
JUDE G. GRAVOIS
MARC E. JOHNSON
ROBERT A. CHAISSON SUSAN S. BUCHHOLZ
STEPHEN J. WINDHORST
FIRST DEPUTY CLERK
HANS J. LILJEBERG
JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR. FIFTH CIRCUIT
MELISSA C. LEDET
JUDGES 101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053)
DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF
POST OFFICE BOX 489
GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054 (504) 376-1400
(504) 376-1498 FAX
www.fifthcircuit.org
NOTICE OF JUDGMENT AND CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY
I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE OPINION IN THE BELOW-NUMBERED MATTER HAS BEEN DELIVERED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 2-16.4 AND 2-16.5 THIS DAY
NOVEMBER 17, 2021 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, CLERK OF COURT, COUNSEL OF RECORD AND ALL
PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW:
21-KA-613
E-NOTIFIED
24TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT (CLERK)
HONORABLE STEPHEN C. GREFER (DISTRICT JUDGE)
THOMAS J. BUTLER (APPELLEE) PRENTICE L. WHITE (APPELLANT)
MAILED
NO ATTORNEYS WERE MAILED