DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Etienne v. Algernon Blair, Inc., 100 So. 2d 533.

14 citing documents.

  • Smith v. Wiley Wood Construction Company 247 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
    [3] See Vezinat v. Marix, La.App., (1968); Miller v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., La.App., (1957); Etienne v. Algernon Blair, Inc., La.App., (1958); Melerine v. Maryland Casualty Company, La.App., (1964); and Russell v. Bemis Brothers Bag Company, La.App., (1964).
  • Manshack v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of Wisconsin 199 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    1st Cir. 1953); (Orl.App.1958); (La.App.
  • Glass v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 166 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Phillips v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, La.App., ; Corral v. Crawford Homes, Inc., La.App., ; Rowan v. Travelers Insurance Company, La.App., ; Etienne v. Algernon Blair, Inc., La.App., ; Phelps v. Royal Indemnity Company, La.App., ; Mouton v. Gulf States Utilities Co., La.App., .
  • Legendre v. J. Ray McDermott & Co. 165 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    *624 “(4) We believe the instant matter is controlled by the line of jurisprudence established in Mouton v. Gulf States Utilities Company, La.App., , [148]; Phelps v. Royal Indemnity Company, La.App., ; Etienne v. Algernon Blair, Inc., La.App., ,; Rowan v. Travelers Insurance Company, La.App., and Corral v. Crawford Homes, Inc., La.App., .
  • Junker v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 163 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    As was true of our brothers of the First Circuit in the case of Phillips v. Underwriters At Lloyd’s of London, supra, we believe this case is controlled by the line of jurisprudence established in Corral v. Crawford Homes, Inc., La.App., ; Rowan v. Travelers Insurance Company, La.App., ; Etienne v. Algernon Blair, Inc., La.App., ; Phelps v. Royal Indemnity Company, La.
  • Elliott v. Insurance Company of North America 159 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
    App. Orleans, 1958, (writs denied), the testimony of two psychiatrists was considered insufficient to establish disability from neurosis where such diagnoses were predicated solely upon subjective symptoms related by the plaintiff.
  • Thomas v. American Insurance Co. 153 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Corral v. Crawford Homes, Inc., supra; Etienne v. Algernon Blair, Inc., La.App., , and Mouton v. Gulf States Utilities Company, La.App., .
  • Hicks v. J. B. Beaird Co. 142 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Orleans, 1958, (writs denied); Mouton v. Gulf States Utilities Co., La.App.
  • Morace v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 140 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    In the Etienne Case [Etienne v. Algernon Blair, La.App., ], supra, we observe the testimony of two psychiatrists was considered insufficient to establish the disability from neurosis where such diagnoses were predicated solely upon subjective symptoms related by plaintiff.
  • Deboest v. Travelers Insurance Company 138 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    2d 387 ; Etienne v. Algernon Blair, Inc., La.App.Orl., ; Hicks v. Royal Indemnity Co., La.App.Orl., (amended as to costs, 229 La.
  • Litton v. London Guaranty & Accident Co. 133 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    1958, certiorari denied April 21, 1958; and Mouton v. Gulf States Utilities Company, La.
  • Phillips v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of London 128 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    We believe the instant matter is controlled by the line of jurisprudence established in Mouton v. Gulf States Utilities Company, La.App., ; Phelps v. Royal Indemnity Company, La.App., ; Etienne v. Algernon Blair, Inc., La.App., ; Rowan v. Travelers Insurance Company, La.App., and Corral v. Crawford Homes, Inc., La.App., .
  • Webber v. Wofford-Brindley Lumber Company 113 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    Citing Etienne v. Algernon Blair, Inc., La.App.Orleans, , and Mouton v. Gulf States Utilities Company, La.App.
  • Rowan v. Travelers Insurance Company 111 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    are not in accordance with the true facts, as disclosed by the credible evidence, and should be disregarded, under the authority of Mouton v. Gulf States Utilities Company, [La.App.]