Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Edwards v. State, 556 So. 2d 644.
-
Covington v. Howard
146 So. 3d 933
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Regardless if stated in terms of proximate cause, legal cause, or duty, the scope of the duty inquiry is ultimately a question of policy as to whether the particular risk falls "within the scope of the duty.” -49 (La.App.
- Nelwin Rider v. Jack Stansberry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
- Rider v. Stansberry 87 So. 3d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- Thomas v. Sheridan 977 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
- Haydin v. Crescent Guardian, Inc. 818 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- Marceaux v. Gibbs 699 So. 2d 1065 La. 1997
- Marceaux v. Gibbs 680 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
-
Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University
655 So. 2d 659
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Roberts, supra; Dixie Drive It Yourself System, supra ; (La.App.
-
LK v. Reed
631 So. 2d 604
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
4th *609 Cir.), writ denied, ($55,000); (La.App.
- Roberts v. Benoit 605 So. 2d 1032 La. 1992
- Willis v. LeTulle 597 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Smith v. English 586 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Wilson v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 576 So. 2d 490 La. 1991
- Nichols v. Nichols 556 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990