DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Trainor v. Young, 561 So. 2d 722.

17 citing documents.

  • Daniel P. McCauley v. Dr. Malcolm Stubbs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • McCauley v. Stubbs 245 So. 3d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    Trainor v. Young , , 726-27 (La.App.
  • In Re Noe 916 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
  • In re Medical Review Proceeding of Sitzman 904 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    The Supreme Court stated in Carter v. Haygood, 2004-0646 (La.1/19/05), , that “in certain circumstances, a 1qdoctor’s continuing professional relationship with his patients might give rise to the suspension or interruption of prescription.” -27 (La.App.
  • Carter v. Haygood 892 So. 2d 1261 La. 2005
  • Brenda Sue Carter, Et Ux. v. Gary Stephen Haygood, Dds La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    We further noted that two appellate cases have recognized this principle, which is based on the fact the continuing relationship is “likely to hinder the patient’s inclination to sue.” 618 So.2d at 843 ( (La.App.
  • Carter v. Haygood 865 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    We further noted that two appellate cases have recognized this principle, which is based on the fact the continuing relationship is “likely to hinder the patient’s inclination to sue.” 618 So.2d at 843 ( (La.App.
  • Benoit v. Archer 820 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    We further noted that two appellate cases have recognized this principle, which is based on the fact the continuing relationship is “likely to hinder the patient’s inclination to sue.” 618 So.2d at 843 ( (La.App.
  • In Re Medical Review Panel, Claim of Moses 788 So. 2d 1173 La. 2001
    618 So.2d at 843 ( (La.App.
  • Kavanaugh v. Edwards 749 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Assignments of Error No. 4, 7 & 9 (La.App.
  • Acosta v. Campbell 744 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    Moreover, in the earliest Louisiana case found to have mentioned the doctrine, -27 (La.App.
  • Morgan v. Moulder 727 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    He also argues that Dr. Moulder’s continual treatment of him through February 1993 suspended the running of prescription, (La.App.
  • Wang v. Broussard 708 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • Taylor v. Giddens 618 So. 2d 834 La. 1993
    Plaintiffs also argue that Dr. Giddens continually treated Mrs. Taylor through the duration of her illness and on the basis of his continual treatment and their continued professional relationship, prescription was suspended until her death, (La.App.
  • Abrams v. Herbert 590 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • Trainor v. Young 567 So. 2d 1124 La. 1990
    Prior report: La.App., .
  • Trainor v. Young 567 So. 2d 1125 La. 1990
    Prior report: La.App., .