Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ball v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, 112 So. 2d 741.
-
Braud v. Dixie MacH. Welding & Metal Works
423 So. 2d 1243
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
1973); Ball v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, (Orl.App.1959); Blanchard v. Engine & Gas Compressor Services, Inc., 613 F.2d 65 (5th Cir.1980); Murphy v. Georgia-Pac.
-
Andersen v. Lummus Construction Co.
411 So. 2d 756
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
4th Cir. 1969), involving sugar refinery; and Ball v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, (La.App.Orl.
-
Waller v. Farmland Industries, Inc.
392 So. 2d 1099
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
4th Cir. 1969); Ball v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, (La.App.
-
Turberville v. Georgia Pac. Chemical Co.
385 So. 2d 366
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
4th Cir. 1969), involving a sugar refinery; and, Ball v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, (La.App.
-
Lushute v. Diesi
354 So. 2d 179
La. 1978
453 , (1950); Ball v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp., (Orl.App.1959), and Horrell v. Gulf & Valley Cotton Oil Co., 15 La.App.
-
Kelly v. Blount Bros.
326 So. 2d 906
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
See also Ball v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation
-
Hudson v. Aetna Casualty Insurance Company
299 So. 2d 499
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
In Ball v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Co., an employee of an electrical contractor was injured during the erection of an aluminum plant Kaiser was to operate.
-
Brown v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp.
289 So. 2d 524
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
They rely partly on the decision in Ball v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation [La.App.], .
-
Duplechin v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company
265 So. 2d 787
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
3 Cir. 1971), where we stated that: "Both Ball v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, supra, [ (La.App.
-
Frey v. Brown
254 So. 2d 491
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
He relies upon Ball v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, (La.App.
-
Allen v. United States Fire Insurance Company
222 So. 2d 887
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1969
453 , (1950); Best v. J & B Drilling Company, La.App., (3rd Cir. 1963); and Ball v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, La.App., (Orl.
-
Townsend v. International Paper Co.
166 So. 2d 558
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
The case of Ball v. Keyser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, (Orleans App.1959) must have been cited by plaintiff through inadvertence.
- Finn v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATION 141 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962