DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Blue Ribbon Cleaners v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 125 So. 2d 613.

18 citing documents.

  • McMullan v. Travelers Insurance Co. 311 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    (Orl.La.App., 1952); Blue Ribbon Cleaners v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Potts v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, (La.
  • Seaton v. Widlitze 258 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    we held, citing Blue Ribbon Cleaners v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., that: “[2, 3] The rule charging negligence to vehicles entering an intersection on an unfavorable signal light cannot be invoked against plaintiff, since plaintiff’s driver entered properly on a green light.
  • Maranell v. United States Fire Insurance 253 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    Potts v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Blue Ribbon Cleaners v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
  • Austin v. Travelers Insurance Co. 236 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    We also agree with the conclusion of the lower court that the principle of law applied in Blue Ribbon Cleaners v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., (La.App.
  • Bettis v. Paulsen-Webber Cordage Corp. 217 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
    32:232(1) (a); Earles v. Volentine, La.App., ; Martin v. Slocum, La.App., ; Dupuy v. Maury, La.App., ; Potts v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, La.App., ; Blue Ribbon Cleaners v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., La.App., ; Schindler v. Gage, La.App., .
  • Carroway v. Stuckey 210 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    Potts v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Blue Ribbon Cleaners v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
  • Close v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. 207 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    1st Cir.1966); Blue Ribbon Cleaners v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., (La.App.
  • Earles v. Volentine 191 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
    (4th Cir. 1961); Schindler v. Gage (La.App.)
  • Fruge v. Aetna Insurance 194 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    See also: Blue Ribbon Cleaners v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., (La.App.
  • Vico Insurance Co. v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 177 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    See Schindler v. Gage, La.App., ; Sangree v. Grilletta, La.App., ; Martin v. Slocum, La.App., ; Blue Ribbon Cleaners v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., La.App., .
  • Reynolds v. Allstate Insurance 176 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    They also argue that under the holding of Blue Ribbon Cleaners v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., La.App., , and under New Orleans City Code, 1956, § 38-42 (a) (1), which is similar to LSA-R.S.
  • Mooring v. Pomeroy 175 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    4 Cir., 1961), ; Potts v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (La.App.
  • Bourgeois v. Francois 161 So. 2d 750 La. 1964
    It was correctly observed by the Court of Appeal in Blue Ribbon Cleaners v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., , that: “If a motorist, entering an intersection properly on a green traffic light and proceeding lawfully through it, must do so at his peril, then traffic signals cease to be safety signals and become traffic traps.” The Court of Appeal in this case also erroneously finds young Breaux negligent in failing to look at
  • Allen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 151 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    App., ; Potts v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., et al., La.App., ; Dupuy v. Maury, La.App., , and Lloyd v. Marquette Casualty Co., La.App., .
  • Sittig v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 149 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    4th Cir., 1961, .” The Supreme Court, in the case of Bryant v. Ouachita Coca-Cola Bottling Company, 239 La.
  • Martin v. Slocum 147 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
    4 Cir., 1961), ; Potts v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (La.App.
  • Gagliano v. Cooper 144 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Conceding, though not accepting as established, the fact that the signal light changed during Mrs. Cooper’s crossing of the intersection, the rule of liability announced by this court in Blue Ribbon Cleaners v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, La.App., , would apply and the burden of liability would be placed upon Gagliano.
  • Potts v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company 135 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961