DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Brown, 115 So. 2d 903.

14 citing documents.

  • Green v. La. Workforce Comm'n 263 So. 3d 629 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
    App. 1 Cir. 1983) ; Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Brown , (La.
  • Bullock v. Administrator, Department of Employment Security 628 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    3rd Cir.1960); Delta Air Lines, (La.App.
  • Martin v. State, Office of Employment Security 554 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    3rd Cir.1960); Delta Air Lines
  • Harris v. Whitfield 519 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    3rd Cir.1960); Delta Airlines, (La.
  • Thompson v. Administrator, Louisiana Office of Employment Security 514 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    3rd Cir.1960); Delta Air Lines
  • Schulin v. Service Painting Co. of Louisiana 479 So. 2d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • Ward v. Blache 466 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    The fact that the Administrator, a nominal party to the proceedings, Delta Air Lines, did not file an exception and aligned itself with plaintiff is immaterial.
  • MacK v. Winn Dixie of Louisiana, Inc. 442 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    3rd Cir.1960); Delta Air Lines
  • State ex rel. Vieux Carre Property Owners & Associates, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Adjustments 197 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    899 , at page 901; Stevens v. Johnson, La.App., ; Lally v. Taylor, La.App., ; Blanke v. Chisesi, La.App., ; Delta Air Lines Inc. v. Brown, La.App., ; Succession of Roux v. Guidry, La.App., ).
  • Scalfano v. Doyal 177 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
  • Austin v. Administrator, Division of Employment Security, Department of Labor 158 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    In support of his application for writs, learned counsel contends the judgment of the trial court in overruling the plea of peremption was erroneous and constitutes an abuse of the trial court's authority in that it is patently contrary to settled jurisprudence as established in Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Brown, La.App., ; Jones v. Brown, La.App., , and Sweet v. Brown, La.App., .
  • Brown v. Courville 155 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Brown, La.App.Orl., .
  • Dameron-Pierson Co. v. Bryant 148 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    l should not be made to suffer by reason of the dereliction of an officer.” “Public officers must perform the duties prescribed by law in a legal and proper manner, and they are not excused from compliance by statutory omission or inconsistencies that may render vague exactly how o.r when the act shall be done.” The appellant relies on three cases, namely, Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Brown, La.App., ; Jones v. Brown, La.App., ; Sweet v. Brown, La.App., .
  • Sweet v. Brown 125 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
    This precise issue was before the court in Delta Air Lines, Inc., v. Brown, La.App.Orleans, 1959, , in which the Board of Review did not notice that claimant had failed to appeal to it within ten (10) days as required by LSA-R.S.