Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Scurria v. Russo, 134 So. 2d 679.

19 citing documents.

Pittman v. Pomeroy 552 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Lanusse v. Gerrets 357 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Valvoline Oil Company v. Krauss 335 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Scurria v. Russo, La.App., ; Lawrence v. Recoulley, La.App., .
State v. Ward 314 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
4th Cir. 1962); (La.App.
Smith v. Smith 311 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Kempff v. Morgan 291 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
J. H. Jenkins Contractors, Inc. v. Farriel 259 So. 2d 882 La. 1972
Scurria v. Russo, La.App., ; Lawrence v. Recoulley, La.App., .
Centanni v. AK Roy, Inc. 258 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
Aubert v. Bourg 259 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Gore v. American Motorists Ins. Co. 244 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Lawrence v. Recoulley 235 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1970
Young v. Stevens 209 So. 2d 25 La. 1968
likewise has to do with a shortage in the area of the property contracted to be sold, not with an encroachment suggesting litigation.
Mediamolle v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad 176 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1965
Stoltz v. Stoltz 162 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
Stack v. Irwin, La.App., ; Baker v. Horowitz, La.App., ; Loeb v. Rabin, La.App., ; Scurria v. Russo, La.App., ; 34 Tul.L.Rev.
Kindred v. Hardie-Meric, Inc. 159 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
385 ; Scurria v. Russo, La.App., ; Papalia v. Hartson, La.App., ) we deem it best to remand the case for further evidence.
Stack v. Irwin 158 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Scurria v. Russo, La.App., ; Matthews v. Gaubler, La.App., .
City of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners 148 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Scurria v. Russo, La.App., ; Modicut v. Rist, La.App., ; Southern United Ice Co. v. Rapides Grocery Co., La.App., 187 So.
Keller Construction Corp. v. George W. McCoy & Co. 138 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Richmond v. Krushevski 139 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
The same question was decided by this court in the cases of Scurria v. Russo, La.App., , No. 21,463 of our docket, on rehearing, and Matthews v. Gaubler, La.App., , in which we held that where the contract to purchase or sell provided “Either party hereto who fails to comply with the terms of this offer, if accepted, is obligated [and agrees] to pay the Agents Commission and all fees a