Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Vailes, 564 So. 2d 778.
- State Of Louisiana v. Rickey Lionel Laurant La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
- State of Louisiana v. Marcus Jackson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
- State Of Louisiana v. Steven Ray Mccarthy La. 2021
-
State v. Spriggs
271 So. 3d 320
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Vailes , , 781 (La.
-
State v. Julien
229 So. 3d 640
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
See Fields, 12-0674, (search and seizure upheld when conducted by two probation officers, including the probationer officer assigned to defendant, after defendant missed appointment with, assigned probation officer); (La.
-
State v. Jason
53 So. 3d 508
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1861 , 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979), 3 State v. *514 Malone, supra, 403 So.2d at 1239 , (La.App.
- State v. Angel 31 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
- State of Louisiana v. Timothy E. Robertson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- State v. Robertson 988 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- State v. Hamilton 845 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- State v. Drane 828 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- State v. Dabney 809 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
- State v. Odom 772 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
- State v. Wesley 685 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
-
State v. Thomas
683 So. 2d 885
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
In its application, the State correctly summarizes the facts of two Second Circuit cases, (La.App.
-
State v. Durr
677 So. 2d 596
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
App. 2d Cir.1991); (La.App.
- State v. Fisher 669 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- State v. Thomas 662 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
- State v. McGee 663 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
-
State v. Shields
614 So. 2d 1279
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
The law concerning a (La.
-
State v. Washington
605 So. 2d 720
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State *724 v. Lewis, supra ; (La.App.
-
State v. Washington
605 So. 2d 720
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State *724 v. Lewis, supra; (La.App.
-
State v. Epperson
576 So. 2d 96
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
While that is correct, more relevant is this court's recent discussion of a warrantless search by a (La.App.
- State v. Vail 571 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990