Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Livaccari v. United Jewish Appeal, Inc., 126 So. 2d 67.

18 citing documents.

Evans v. Regional Transit Authority 823 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Further, Mr. Evans argues that under Jacobs as Tutor of Jacobs v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., the inconvenience of treatment is a proper consideration in determining the reasonableness of a person’s refusal to submit to treatment, and that under Livaccari v. United Jewish Appeal, Inc., (La.App.
Jenkins v. Lindsey 693 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
3d Cir.1987), writ denied, Livaccari v. United Jewish Appeal, Inc., (La.App.
Jones v. Hyatt Corp. of Delaware 681 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Likewise, Livaccari v. United Jewish Appeal, Inc., (La.App.
Knight v. Miller 503 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
2nd Cir.1965); Livacarri v. United Jewish Appeal, Inc., (La.App.
Young v. Department of Hospitals 365 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Livaccari v. United Jewish Appeal, Inc., (La.App.
Stevens v. Gulf American Fire & Casualty Company 317 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Livaccari v. United Jewish Appeal, Inc., (4th La.App., 1961), (certiorari denied March 3, 1961.)
Foret v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 293 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Livaccari v. United Jewish Appeal, Inc., (La.App., 4th Cir. 1961—cert.
Molton v. Avrard 293 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
However, defendant previously cites the Livaccarri v. United Jewish Appeal, Inc. case (La.App., ) concerning burden of proof of the existence of injuries and causal connection.
Deo Gracias v. Collins 236 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Forsythe, La.App., ; Lucas v. Broussard, La.App., ; Hatfield v. Bernos, La.App., ; Messana v. Allstate Insurance Company, La.App., ; Musco v. General Guaranty Insurance Company, La.App., ; Smith v. Borchers, La.App., ; Gallioto v. Chisholm, La.App., ; Livaccari v. United Jewish Appeal, Inc., La.App., .
McGuire v. Oliver 227 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Livaccari v. United Jewish Appeal, Inc., (La.App., 4th Cir. 1961 — cert.
Apffel v. Greyhound Corp. 216 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Rainwater v. Timothy, La.App., (1956); Livaccari v. United Jewish Appeal, Inc., La.App., (1961); Waggoner v. Marquette Casualty Company, La.App., (1965); and Bolin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, La.App., (1967).
Davis v. Allstate Insurance Co. 206 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
212 , (1958); Livaccari v. United Jewish Appeal, Inc., La.App., (4th Cir, 1961) We are in disagreement with the argument that the use of the football as in the instant case constituted the use of a dangerous instrumentality.
Julian v. Ralph 206 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
The burden of proof is clearly on the plaintiff to establish every element of his cause to a legal certainty by a clear preponderance of evidence, Livaccari v. United Jewish Appeal, Inc., La.App., .
Carles v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 184 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Waggoner v. Marquette Casualty Company 181 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
4 Cir., 1961) , plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident and was attended by a physician on eight different occasions and was discharged to return to work.
Guarisco v. Swindle 132 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
338 , ; Robinson v. Great American Indemnity Company et al., La.App., ; Gautreaux v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Company, et al., La.App., ; McLehaney v. Great American Indemnity Co. et al., La.App., ; Livaccari v. United Jewish Appeal, Inc., Norman Merlan and Royal Indemnity Company, La.App., and Emmco Insurance Company and Sam J. Miller v. Ferrara, La.App., .
Hernandez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 128 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
McCoy v. State Farm Mutual Ins. Co. 129 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961