State v. Mitchell
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., March 12, 1962 138 So. 2d 610
State v. Mitchell, 69 So. 851 (La. 1915).
Cited by
- State v. White 125 So. 2d 413 La. 1960
- State v. Kelly 125 So. 2d 412 La. 1960
- State v. Laborde 38 So. 2d 371 La. 1948
- State v. Montgomery 144 So. 433 La. 1932
- State v. Roy 94 So. 703 La. 1922
- State v. Authement 72 So. 739 La. 1916
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Hamilton 128 La. 91
Opinion text
SOMMERVILLE, J. The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment in the parish jail for 6 months, and to pay a fine of $300 and costs, and, in default of paying the fine and costs, to additional imprisonment in the parish jail for a period of 12 months, subject to working the sentence out according to the ordinance of the policy jury. The state moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that this court is without jurisdiction. [1, 2] Article 85 of the Constitution provides that the Supreme Court, in criminal cases, shall have appellate jurisdiction on questions of law alone, whenever the punishment of death or imprisonment at hard labor may be inflicted, or a fine exceeding $300, or imprisonment exceeding 6 months, is “actually” imposed. The offense charged, that of retailing intoxicating liquors without first having obtained a license, is not punishable by death, or by imprisonment at hard labor, and the fine imposed on defendant does not exceed $300, and the imprisonment “actually” imposed does not exceed 6 months. The additional imprisonment in the parish jail for a period of 12 months in default of paying the fine of $300 is not a term of imprisonment “actually” imposed. State v. Hamilton, 128 La. 91 , 54 South. 482 . The appeal is dismissed. See dissenting opinion of O’NIELL, J., 69 South. 852 .