Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hines v. Williams, 567 So. 2d 1139.

39 citing documents.

State of Louisiana In the Interest of A.L. and K.L. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State in the Interest of R.J.J. & M.L.J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Hall Ponderosa, LLC v. Petrohawk Properties, Lp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
“Proof by clear and convincing evidence requires more than „a preponderance of the evidence,‟ the traditional measure of persuasion, but less than „beyond a reasonable doubt,‟ the stringent criminal standard.” (La.App.
Hall Ponderosa, LLC v. Petrohawk Properties, L.P. 90 So. 3d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“Proof by clear and convincing evidence requires more than ‘a preponderance of the evidence,’ the traditional measure of persuasion, but less than ‘beyond a reasonable doubt,’ the stringent criminal standard.” (La.App.
State in the Interest of B.K.N. & T.M.H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State in Interest of Bkn 82 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State Ex Rel. Ks 66 So. 3d 70 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State in the Interest of K.S., K.S. & D.S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State ex rel. K.S. 66 So. 3d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1 Cir. 5/27/05), ; (La.App.
Johnson v. ST. PATRICK HOSP. 832 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Cd v. Lc 796 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
In the Interest of C.D. v. L.C. 796 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Brown v. Ruskin Mfg. Co. 756 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Harvey v. BE & K CONST. 716 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Cleveland v. Delhi Guest Home, 29,506 (La.App.2d Cir.05/07/97), ; (La.App.
Traweek v. City of West Monroe 713 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
In the Interest of S.R.S. 688 So. 2d 1145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State in Interest of BJ 672 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Henry v. Gulf Coast Cas. Ins. Co. 670 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Green v. Conagra Broiler Co. 651 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Bundren v. Affiliated Nursing Homes 649 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State in Interest of QP 649 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State ex rel. R.E. 642 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
STATE, DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES v. Jones 638 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State in Interest of JL 636 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Lannes v. Jefferson Door Co. 638 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Litton v. Litton 624 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Givens 616 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
writ denied, State v. Stringer, supra .
Touzet v. Mobley 612 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Bailey v. Smelser Oil & Gas, Inc. 609 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
STATE, IN INTEREST OF EZELL v. Evans 600 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
writ denied, State v. Stringer, supra .
State ex rel. CH 599 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Santiny ex rel. Santiny v. Pitre 591 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
“Whether there has been adequate proof of descent from an alleged parent is a question of fact.” (La.App.
Sj v. Pm 586 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Welch, supra .; (La.App.
Chatelain v. STATE, DOTD 586 So. 2d 1373 La. 1991
4th Cir.), writ denied, (1990), and insufficient evidence, (La.
State in Interest of Lawrence v. Harrell 582 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State in Interest of J 582 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Willis v. Letulle 581 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Hines v. Williams 571 So. 2d 653 La. 1990
Prior report: La.App., .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by