Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gambino v. Lubel, 190 So. 2d 152.

17 citing documents.

  • Spicuzza v. Fonseca 537 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Fowler v. Roberts 526 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • Knight v. Miller 503 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • Tobey v. State 454 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • Dunaway v. Rester Refrigeration Service, Inc. 428 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Champagne v. McDonald 355 So. 2d 1335 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    2nd Cir. 1949); (La.App.
  • Dodge v. Pierre 348 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
  • Martino v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 351 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
  • Stevenson v. Delahaye 310 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    Appellant argues that the rescue doctrine applies in the instant case and that he, being a rescuer, should be able to collect for his injuries from the defendants as their negligence invited his rescue attempt, (La.App.
  • Reliance Insurance Company v. T. DICKENS 279 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
  • Siau v. Rapides Parish School Board 264 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
  • King v. Investment Equities, Inc. 264 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    We are thoroughly in accord with the pronouncement in Gambino v. Lubel, La.App., , to the effect that an individual with an infirmity is held to the same degree of care of an ordinary prudent person which the law establishes for everyone, and that to fulfill this duty, an incapacitated person may be required to exert greater care for his own safety than is demanded of an individual free of physica
  • Hebert v. Perkins 260 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
    Appellants do not dispute the factual findings of the trial court, but complain that it erred in excusing Perkins' alleged negligence (running a red light) on "an extension of the rescue doctrine and good Samaritan rule", writs refused 249 La.
  • Chastain v. Allstate Insurance Company 212 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
    Lynch v. Fisher, La.App., (2d Cir., 1949); Gambino v. Lubel and Lubel v. Gambino, La.App., (4th Cir., *245 1966).
  • Deason v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 209 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    *578 Jur.2d 244, Section 693; Gambino v. Lubel, (La.App., 4 Cir., 1966), .
  • Lubel v. Gambino 191 So. 2d 640 La. 1966
  • Lubel v. Gambino 191 So. 2d 639 La. 1966