DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Company, 209 So. 2d 105.

21 citing documents.

  • Rushing v. Insurance Co. of North America 417 So. 2d 1351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    2d Cir. 1981); Fontenot v. Pan-American Fire & Casualty Company, (La.App.
  • Otzenberger v. Atlas Construction Co. 408 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    In Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Company, (La.App.
  • Liedtke v. Allstate Ins. Co. 405 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Co., (La.App.
  • Williams v. Baker 398 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    4th Cir. 1970); Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Co., (La.App.
  • Gaudet v. GDC, INC. 383 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    In Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Company, (La.App.
  • Rayner v. Pharis & Pharis 363 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
  • Distinguished Manuel v. Manuel 299 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    For similar facts see Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Company, (La.App.
  • Rills v. Southern Bell Telephone Company 289 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    In Fontenot v. Pan American Fire and Casualty Company, La.App., , the Court said: "However, if the motorist is about to make a left turn sees or should see that a following vehicle is engaged in a passing maneuver, in close proximity to his own vehicle and at an intersection, he can no longer rely on the presumption that the following vehicle is going to obey the law * * * had Mis
  • Montgomery v. City of New Orleans 266 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Company, (La.App.
  • Lewis v. South Central Bell Telephone Co. 260 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    While under our jurisprudence, as reflected by Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Company, (La.App.
  • Walker v. Milton 253 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Company, (La.App.
  • Smith v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 244 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    •425, ; LeDoux v. Montgomery, La.App., ; Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Company, La.App., ; Huntsberry v. Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co., La.
  • Stevenson v. Pardue 244 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    The driver executing such a left turn must not only give a proper signal but must also observe both oncoming and following traffic to ascertain that the turn can be made with safety.” Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Soileau v. Continental Insurance Co., La.App., ; McCann v. Mercer, La.App., .
  • Smith v. Girley 242 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    Fontenot, et al. v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Co., *36 et al., La.App., , and Meaux v. Hoffpauir, La.App., , which deal with incidental demands, are in accord with Tubbs, above.
  • Guillory v. Travelers Insurance Co. 241 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    32:76, which provides that no vehicle shall be driven on the left side of the highway “when approaching within 100 feet of or traversing any intersection.” In Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Company, (1968), writ of certiorari denied, we reviewed at length the jurisprudence construing this statute.
  • McGehee v. Cox 233 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Company, (La.App.
  • Spell v. Travelers Insurance Co. 232 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    In the recent case of Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Company, writ of certiorari refused, we construed the requirement of “reasonable care” under the above cited statute as follows: “When a left turn is being made at a place other than an intersection, as for instance at a private driveway, the jurisprudence requires a very high degree of care.
  • Soileau v. Continental Insurance Company 228 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
    In Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Company, La.App., (3rd Cir.1968) writ of certiorari refused, we reviewed at length the jurisprudence on the question of what constitutes an intersection within the meaning of the statute.
  • Meaux v. Hoffpauir 219 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
  • Brignac v. Transamerica Insurance 220 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    See Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casual *563 ty Co., La.App.3d Cir., -114 .
  • Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Co. 211 So. 2d 328 La. 1968