Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bauman v. Heausler, 188 So. 2d 189.

13 citing documents.

  • Dixon v. Winston 417 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    456 , Whittington v. Levy (La.App.), , Bauman v. Heausler (La.App.), and Mut v. Roy et al. (La.App.), .
  • Curry v. Bagwell 379 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    1st Cir. 1976), writ refused La., (1977); (La.App.
  • Ogden v. Smith 344 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
  • Caroli v. Britt 284 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    456 , Whittington v. Levy (La.App.), , Bauman v. Heausler (La.App.), and Mut v. Roy et al. (La.App.), .
  • McCullough v. McANNELLY 248 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    App.), and Mut v. Roy et al. (La.App.), .
  • Murray v. Dominick 236 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1970
    (La.App., 4th Cir.1966—writ refused, 249 La.
  • Davis v. Pena 222 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    The following cases are pertinent to this consideration : ; ; ; Azevedo v. Frasc
  • Buchert v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company 219 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
    Gallagher v. Taylor, La.App., , (775); Bauman v. Heausler, La.App., , and authorities therein cited; Muller v. Zimmer, La.App., .
  • Tripoli v. Gurry 218 So. 2d 563 La. 1969
    456 , Whittington v. Levy (La.App.), , Bauman v. Heausler (La.App.), and Mut v. Roy et al. (La.App.), .
  • Tripoli v. Gurry 206 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    This is so because he has not availed himself of the opportunity to end the altercation by a lawful means.” In Bauman v. Heausler, La.App., , we found a situation which resembles that presented here.
  • Gallagher v. Taylor 203 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
  • Bauman v. Heausler 190 So. 2d 235 La. 1966
  • Derouen v. American Employers Insurance 118 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    See also Marquez vs. Miller, ; Bonner vs. Boudreaux, ; Armstrong vs. New Orleans Public Service Corporation, ; Wendel [Weddle] vs. Phelen, 177 So.