Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bauman v. Heausler, 188 So. 2d 189.
-
Dixon v. Winston
417 So. 2d 122
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
456 , Whittington v. Levy (La.App.), , Bauman v. Heausler (La.App.), and Mut v. Roy et al. (La.App.), .
-
Curry v. Bagwell
379 So. 2d 1163
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
1st Cir. 1976), writ refused La., (1977); (La.App.
- Ogden v. Smith 344 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
-
Caroli v. Britt
284 So. 2d 188
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
456 , Whittington v. Levy (La.App.), , Bauman v. Heausler (La.App.), and Mut v. Roy et al. (La.App.), .
-
McCullough v. McANNELLY
248 So. 2d 7
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
App.), and Mut v. Roy et al. (La.App.), .
-
Murray v. Dominick
236 So. 2d 626
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1970
(La.App., 4th Cir.1966writ refused, 249 La.
-
Davis v. Pena
222 So. 2d 595
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
The following cases are pertinent to this consideration : ; ; ; Azevedo v. Frasc
-
Buchert v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
219 So. 2d 584
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
Gallagher v. Taylor, La.App., , (775); Bauman v. Heausler, La.App., , and authorities therein cited; Muller v. Zimmer, La.App., .
-
Tripoli v. Gurry
218 So. 2d 563
La. 1969
456 , Whittington v. Levy (La.App.), , Bauman v. Heausler (La.App.), and Mut v. Roy et al. (La.App.), .
-
Tripoli v. Gurry
206 So. 2d 163
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
This is so because he has not availed himself of the opportunity to end the altercation by a lawful means.” In Bauman v. Heausler, La.App., , we found a situation which resembles that presented here.
- Gallagher v. Taylor 203 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
- Bauman v. Heausler 190 So. 2d 235 La. 1966
-
Derouen v. American Employers Insurance
118 So. 2d 522
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
See also Marquez vs. Miller, ; Bonner vs. Boudreaux, ; Armstrong vs. New Orleans Public Service Corporation, ; Wendel [Weddle] vs. Phelen, 177 So.