Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Crowder v. Crowder, 595 So. 2d 810.
- Green v. Scott 687 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
- Prater v. Prater 682 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- Campbell v. Campbell 682 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
-
Voorhies v. Voorhies
688 So. 2d 1158
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
3 Cir.), writ denied, (La.App.
-
Barrios v. Barrios
694 So. 2d 290
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
writ denied, -05 (La.App.
-
Humphrey v. Humphrey
660 So. 2d 92
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
DISCUSSION Both parties have raised the issue of the applicability of two cases in particular: (La.App.
- State v. Reed 658 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
- State v. Dice 653 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
- Mondello v. Mondello 647 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
- Megison v. Megison 642 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
- Wade v. Wade 641 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
- Johno v. Johno 633 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
- Zatzkis v. Zatzkis 632 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
- Crefasi v. Crefasi 628 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
- Allen v. Allen 626 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- Barto v. Barto 618 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
-
Peltier v. Peltier
617 So. 2d 201
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Crowder *203 v. Crowder, (La.
- Broussard v. Broussard 617 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
- Rushing v. Rushing 614 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
-
Norris v. Norris
604 So. 2d 107
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
However, this court rejected the "any change" analysis, noting that such an approach would promote instability in child support matters by inviting frequent relitigation.
-
Crowder v. Crowder
598 So. 2d 358
La. 1992
Prior report: La.App., .