Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Comet Industries, Inc. v. Lawrence, 600 So. 2d 85.
-
Kimball v. Anesthesia Specialists
809 So. 2d 405
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
23:921(C)); Comet Industries, (La.App.
- TURNER PROFESSIONAL SERV. v. Broussard 762 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
-
SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond
759 So. 2d 1047
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Comet Industries, (La.App.
-
Stumpf v. Richardson
748 So. 2d 1225
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
1st Cir. 1992); Comet Indus., (La.App.
-
Moreno and Associates v. Black
741 So. 2d 91
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Comet Industries, (La.App.
-
Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. v. Untereker
731 So. 2d 965
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
5 Cir. 1993); Comet Indus., (La.App.
-
Wied v. TRCM, LLC
698 So. 2d 685
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
See Summit Institute v. Prouty, 29,829 (La.App.2d Cir. 4/9/97), ; -88 (La.App.
-
Dixie Parking Service, Inc. v. Hargrove
691 So. 2d 1316
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
2 Cir. 5/13/92), , writ denied, 92-1683 (La.9/25/92), .
-
AMCOM of Louisiana, Inc. v. Battson
666 So. 2d 1227
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Comet Industries, (La.App.
-
LaFourche Speech & Language Services, Inc. v. Juckett
652 So. 2d 679
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
App. 4th Cir.1993); Comet Industries, (La.App.
-
Cellular One, Inc. v. Boyd
653 So. 2d 30
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
5th Cir.1993); Comet Industries, (La.App.
-
Fudge v. Levine
647 So. 2d 405
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Comet Industries, (La.App.
-
Harris v. BAG
647 So. 2d 542
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Comet Industries, writ denied
-
Francois Chiropractic Center v. Fidele
630 So. 2d 923
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
"As the statute itself so plainly says, "the Second Circuit stated in Comet Industries, Inc. v. Lawrence [ ], "these contracts are against public policy ..."
-
Water Processing Tech., Inc. v. Ridgeway
618 So. 2d 533
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
ikewise, an agreement which purported to prohibit the employee from competing against the employer "anywhere within the continental United States" was found to be unenforceable as written since it failed to specify the "parish or parishes, municipality or municipalities, or parts thereof" wherein the employer carried on like business, as required by § 23:921 C. Comet Industries, (La.App.
-
Medivision, Inc. v. Germer
617 So. 2d 69
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
See Comet Industries, (La.App.
-
Daiquiri's III on Bourbon, Ltd. v. Wandfluh
608 So. 2d 222
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
In Comet Industries, (2nd Cir.1992) and Comet Industries, (2nd Cir.1992), companion cases with facts remarkably similar to the matter at hand, the employer sought injunctions against its former employees on the basis of covenantnot-to-compete agreements which provided as follows: "Employee agrees that during t
-
Comet Industries, Inc. v. Colvin
600 So. 2d 89
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
These precise issues, concerning another former employee of appellant and the same above-quoted contractual language, are addressed in Comet Industries, (La.App.