Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Tucker, 604 So. 2d 600.

31 citing documents.

State v. Cooper 830 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Young 820 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Lawrence 817 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Vingle 802 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Boson 778 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Lewis 772 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Brown 773 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Patterson 758 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Harris 744 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Hill 743 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Creecy 742 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Cook 733 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Tucker, *1232 (La.App.
State v. Poche 733 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Shaw 736 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Dappemont 734 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Willis 728 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Sheehan 740 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Jones 720 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Dillon 719 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Benjamin 703 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Basile 700 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Clausen 697 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Short 694 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Curtis 681 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Ellington 680 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Harper 660 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
writ denied, modified on other grounds
State v. Jackson 641 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
1st Cir.1992); there was not sufficient justification for an investigatory stop, (La.App.
State v. Jackson 641 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
1st Cir.1992); there was not sufficient justification for an investigatory stop, (La.App.
State v. Tucker 626 So. 2d 707 La. 1993
As the court of appeal concluded in this case, -609 (2d Cir.1992), under a faithful application of our settled state constitutional and legislated law, the officers' show of force and authoritytaking the form of orders by armed, uniformed officers to "halt" and "prone out"adequately conveyed the message that the defendant Tucker was not free to leave.
State v. Balthazar 617 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Further, the Louisiana Supreme Court granted a writ granted, a Second Circuit case which found Hodari D. inapplicable to a search and seizure analysis under the Louisiana Constitution.
State v. Harris 613 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993