Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Keeth v. STATE, EX REL. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & TRANSP., 618 So. 2d 1154.

77 citing documents.

Scott v. Roberts 856 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Safety & Transp., (La.App.
Adams v. Chenault 836 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
2 Cir. 5/5/03), , writ dism., 93-1569 (La.6/18/93), .
Angelle v. Delery 833 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
Safety & Transp., (La.App.
LeBleu v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana 824 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Safety & Transp., (La.App.
Dennis v. Turner 806 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
GENERAL DAMAGES General damages are those which may not be fixed with pecuniary exactitude; instead, they “involve mental or physical pain or suffering, inconvenience, the loss of intellectual gratification or physical enjoyment, or other losses of life or lifestyle which cannot be definitively measured in monetary terms.” (La.App.
Rougeau v. Hyundai Motor America 805 So. 2d 147 La. 2002
[3] The case cited by plaintiff for the proposition that seat belt evidence is inadmissible in cases involving the DOTD, and thus is not limited to vehicle-to-vehicle collisions, (La.App.
Dumas v. City of New Orleans 803 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Safety & Transp., (La.App.
Johnson v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport 792 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Safety and Transp., (La.App.
Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 773 So. 2d 670 La. 2000
Safety & Transp., (La.App.
Johnson v. Brookshire Grocery Co., Inc. 754 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
App.2d Cir.6/26/96), ; (La.
Henderson v. Sutherland's Lumber Co. 733 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
App.2d Cir.8/19/94), , writ denied, 94-2351, 94-2557 (La.11/19/94), ; (La.App.
Gladney v. May 697 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Keeth v. Department of Public Safety & Transportation, (La.App.
Thompson v. Coates 694 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Jackson v. Town of Grambling 690 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Hickman v. Southern Pacific Transport Co., 262 La.
Sallis v. City of Bossier City 680 So. 2d 1333 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
De Los Reyes v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. 677 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Baughman v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 674 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Stephens v. Town of Jonesboro, 25,715 (La.App.2d Cir. 8/19/94), ; (La.App.
Holt v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP & DEV. 671 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Holt v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 671 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Coutee v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. 664 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Thomas v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT 662 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Loss of Future Earnings This court succinctly discussed the considerations involved in awarding sums for lost future earnings in Keeth v. Dept. Of Public Safety & Transp., : Awards for lost future income are inherently speculative and are intrinsically insusceptible of being calculated with mathematical certainty.
Kessler v. Southmark Corp. 643 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Keeth v. Department of Public Safety & Transportation, (La.App.
Stephens v. Town of Jonesboro 642 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Choyce v. SISTERS 642 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Caldwell v. Smith 641 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Keeth v. Department of Public Safety & Transportation, (La.App.
Whitaker v. Mullinax 628 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Keeth v. Dept. of Public Safety & Transportation, writ denied
Laing v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. 628 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Keeth v. Dept. of Public Safety & Transportation, (La.App.