James Ivory, Crystal Lombard Versus Travelers Property and Casualty Company

JAMES IVORY, CRYSTAL LOMBARD, ET AL NO. 24-C-355

VERSUS FIFTH CIRCUIT

TRAVELERS PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COURT OF APPEAL
COMPANY, ET AL
STATE OF LOUISIANA

September 23, 2024

Linda Wiseman
First Deputy Clerk

IN RE TRAVELERS PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY

APPLYING FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT,
PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA, DIRECTED TO THE HONORABLE SHAYNA BEEVERS
MORVANT, DIVISION "M", NUMBER 807-692

Panel composed of Judges Marc E. Johnson,
Scott U. Schlegel, and Timothy S. Marcel

WRIT DENIED

In this case arising from an automobile rear-end collision on July 5, 2019,
defendant Travelers Property and Casualty Company seeks supervisory review of a
judgment of the trial court granting a partial motion for summary judgment in
favor of plaintiffs declaring the insurance policy provided by Travelers to plaintiff
James Ivory does provide uninsured / underinsured motorist (“UM/UIM”)
coverage.

In its writ application, Travelers argues that summary judgment should not
have been granted because there exists a genuine issue of material fact as to
whether Mr. Ivory signed a valid form rejecting UM/UIM coverage. Travelers
also argues that the trial court erred in its application of Tennessee law on
UM/UIM coverage. (It is undisputed by parties that Tennessee law applies to this
policy which was issued in Tennessee.)

Appellate courts review summary judgments de novo using the same criteria
that govern the trial court’s determination of whether summary judgment is
appropriate. In re Succession of O'Krepki, 16-50 (La. App. 5 Cir. 5/26/16, 5), 193
So.3d 574, 577. A motion for summary judgment should be granted if, after an
adequate opportunity for discovery, the motion, memorandum, and supporting
documents show that there is no genuine issue as to material fact and that the
mover is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. La. C.C.P. art. 966(A)(3). A
material fact is one that potentially insures or prevents recovery, affects a litigant’s
ultimate success, or determines the outcome of the lawsuit. Mealey v. Lopez, 16-77
(La. App. 5 Cir. 5/26/16), 193 So.3d 539, 542. An issue is genuine if it is such that
reasonable persons could disagree; if only one conclusion could be reached by

24-C-355 1

reasonable persons, summary judgment is appropriate as there is no need for a trial
on the issue. Id.

Whether Mr. Ivory signed a valid UM rejection is clearly a material fact;
however, under the facts of this case, it is not a genuine one because the policy
numbers on the UM rejection forms from 2014 and 2016 attached by Travelers
opposition to the motion for summary judgment do not match the number of the
policy in effect at the time of the accident in 2019 under which plaintiff seeks
coverage. In other words, Travelers has provided no evidence of a UM rejection
form (valid or otherwise) applicable to the policy at issue.

Travelers’ argument that such a rejection form is unnecessary in Tennessee
is not supported by Tennessee law. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-7-1201 (mandating
UM coverage for all automobile policies delivered in the state unless rejected in
writing by the named insured.)

On de novo review, we agree with the trial court that there is no genuine
issue of material fact, and we find no legal error in the trial court’s application of
Tennessee law. This writ is denied.

Gretna, Louisiana, this 23rd day of September, 2024.

TSM
MEJ
SUS

24-C-355 2

SUSAN M. CHEHARDY CURTIS B. PURSELL

CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT

SUSAN S. BUCHHOLZ
FREDERICKA H. WICKER
CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK
JUDE G. GRAVOIS
MARC E. JOHNSON
STEPHEN J. WINDHORST LINDA M. WISEMAN
JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR.
FIRST DEPUTY CLERK
SCOTT U. SCHLEGEL
TIMOTHY S. MARCEL FIFTH CIRCUIT
MELISSA C. LEDET
JUDGES 101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053)
DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF
POST OFFICE BOX 489
GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054 (504) 376-1400

(504) 376-1498 FAX
www.fifthcircuit.org

NOTICE OF DISPOSITION CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY
I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE DISPOSITION IN THE FOREGOING MATTER HAS BEEN
TRANSMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 4-6 THIS
DAY 09/23/2024 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, THE TRIAL COURT CLERK OF COURT, AND AT LEAST ONE OF
THE COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY, AND TO EACH PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY
COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW:

24-C-355
E-NOTIFIED
24th Judicial District Court (Clerk)
Honorable Shayna Beevers Morvant (DISTRICT JUDGE)
Honorable John E. LeBlanc (DISTRICT JUDGE)
Lance E. Harwell (Relator) Thomas J. Eppling (Relator)

MAILED
David D. Bravo (Respondent) Scott A. Cannon (Respondent)
Attorney at Law Attorney at Law
1100 Poydras Street 122 Village Street
Suite 2601 Slidell, LA 70458
New Orleans, LA 70163