State of Louisiana Versus Dominique L. Linton

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 24-K-151

VERSUS FIFTH CIRCUIT

DOMINIQUE L. LINTON COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF LOUISIANA

April 03, 2024

Susan Buchholz
Chief Deputy Clerk

IN RE STATE OF LOUISIANA

APPLYING FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE FORTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH
OF ST JOHN THE BAPTIST, STATE OF LOUISIANA, DIRECTED TO THE HONORABLE VERCELL FIFFIE,
DIVISION "A", NUMBER 2019-CR-179

Panel composed of Judges Susan M. Chehardy,
Jude G. Gravois, and John J. Molaison, Jr.

WRIT GRANTED; SEQUESTRATION ORDER VACATED

In this emergency writ application, the State seeks supervisory review of the
trial court’s ruling ordering the mother of the victim of alleged rape and sexual
battery to be sequestered for as long as the mother remains under subpoena. Trial is
in progress.

According to the Minutes Report attached to the writ application, the State
sought the mother’s release from the trial subpoena after the mother testified (and
was cross-examined) at trial, but the defense has indicated that it intends to recall
the mother as a witness.

La. C.E. art. 615, “Exclusion of witnesses,” provides, in pertinent part:

A. As a matter of right. On its own motion the court may,
and on request of a party the court shall, order that the
witnesses be excluded from the courtroom or from a
place where they can see or hear the proceedings, and
refrain from discussing the facts of the case with anyone
other than counsel in the case. In the interest of justice,
the court may exempt any witness from its order of
exclusion.
B. Exceptions. This Article does not authorize exclusion of
any of the following:
***

24-K-151

(4) The victim of the offense or the family of the victim.

While it is true that the purposes of sequestration are to assure that a witness
testifies as to his own knowledge, to prevent witnesses from being influenced by
the testimony of others, and to strengthen the role of cross-examination in
developing facts, State v. Strother, 43,363 (La. App. 2 Cir. 8/20/08, 990 So.2d 130,
138, writ denied, 08-2289 (La. 5/15/09), 8 So.3d 580, La. C.E. art. 615(B)(4)
specifically excludes the family of the victim from an order of sequestration,
without further restrictions. Accordingly, the trial court’s order of sequestration of
the victim’s mother is erroneous.

We therefore grant the writ, vacate the trial court’s Sequestration Order, and
order that the victim’s mother be allowed to remain in the courtroom for the
duration of the trial, pursuant to La. C.E. art. 615(B)(4).

Gretna, Louisiana, this 3rd day of April, 2024.

SMC
JGG
JJM

2

SUSAN M. CHEHARDY CURTIS B. PURSELL

CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT

SUSAN S. BUCHHOLZ
FREDERICKA H. WICKER
CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK
JUDE G. GRAVOIS
MARC E. JOHNSON
STEPHEN J. WINDHORST LINDA M. WISEMAN
JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR.
FIRST DEPUTY CLERK
SCOTT U. SCHLEGEL
TIMOTHY S. MARCEL FIFTH CIRCUIT
MELISSA C. LEDET
JUDGES 101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053)
DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF
POST OFFICE BOX 489
GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054 (504) 376-1400

(504) 376-1498 FAX
www.fifthcircuit.org

NOTICE OF DISPOSITION CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY
I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE DISPOSITION IN THE FOREGOING MATTER HAS BEEN
TRANSMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 4-6 THIS
DAY 04/03/2024 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, THE TRIAL COURT CLERK OF COURT, AND AT LEAST ONE OF
THE COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY, AND TO EACH PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY
COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW:

24-K-151
E-NOTIFIED
40th District Court (Clerk)
Honorable Vercell Fiffie (DISTRICT JUDGE)
Honorable Bridget A. Dinvaut (Relator)
Jason M. Galjour (Relator)

MAILED
Dennis W. Moore (Respondent)
Attorney at Law
716 Opelousas Avenue
New Orleans, LA 70114