State of Louisiana Versus Robert Celestine
State of Louisiana Versus Robert Celestine, No. 24-KH-467 (La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. Nov. 15, 2024).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Parker 711 So. 2d 694
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 24-KH-467
VERSUS FIFTH CIRCUIT
ROBERT CELESTINE COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF LOUISIANA
November 15, 2024
Linda Wiseman
First Deputy Clerk
IN RE ROBERT CELESTINE
APPLYING FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT,
PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA, DIRECTED TO THE HONORABLE E. ADRIAN ADAMS,
DIVISION "G", NUMBER 18-2962
Panel composed of Judges Susan M. Chehardy,
Fredericka Homberg Wicker, and Marc E. Johnson
WRIT DENIED
Relator, Robert Celestine, seeks review of the trial court’s August 27, 2024
denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. In his motion, Relator challenged
the validity of his habitual offender sentence for his obstruction of justice conviction,
arguing that La. R.S. 15:529.1 only applies to convictions for violent offenses. Thus,
he claims that the trial court had no authority to accept his guilty plea under the
habitual offender statute. In its denial of Relator’s motion, the trial court found no
illegality in Relator’s sentences because the terms of the sentences imposed are
within the statutory parameters.
La. C.Cr.P. art. 882(A) states, “An illegal sentence may be corrected at any
time by the court that imposed the sentence or by an appellate court on review.”
Although La. C.Cr.P. art. 882(A) states that an illegal sentence may be correct at any
time, a defendant must point to an illegal term in his sentence to raise a claim
cognizable in a motion to correct an illegal sentence. State v. Parker, 98-256 (La.
5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694, 695.
After review, we agree with the trial court and do not find an error in the denial
of Relator’s motion. Despite Relator’s captioning of his application as a motion to
correct an illegal sentence, his filing failed to point to a claimed illegal term in his
habitual offender sentence; rather, the filing challenged the validity of his habitual
offender sentence.
Accordingly, the writ application is denied.
Gretna, Louisiana, this 15th day of November, 2024.
MEJ
SMC
FHW
SUSAN M. CHEHARDY CURTIS B. PURSELL
CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT
SUSAN S. BUCHHOLZ
FREDERICKA H. WICKER
CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK
JUDE G. GRAVOIS
MARC E. JOHNSON
STEPHEN J. WINDHORST LINDA M. WISEMAN
JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR.
FIRST DEPUTY CLERK
SCOTT U. SCHLEGEL
TIMOTHY S. MARCEL FIFTH CIRCUIT
MELISSA C. LEDET
JUDGES 101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053)
DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF
POST OFFICE BOX 489
GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054 (504) 376-1400
(504) 376-1498 FAX
www.fifthcircuit.org
NOTICE OF DISPOSITION CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY
I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE DISPOSITION IN THE FOREGOING MATTER HAS BEEN
TRANSMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 4-6 THIS
DAY 11/15/2024 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, THE TRIAL COURT CLERK OF COURT, AND AT LEAST ONE OF
THE COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY, AND TO EACH PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY
COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW:
24-KH-467
E-NOTIFIED
24th Judicial District Court (Clerk)
Honorable E. Adrian Adams (DISTRICT JUDGE)
Thomas J. Butler (Respondent)
MAILED
Robert Celestine #577553 (Relator)
Raymond Laborde Correctional Center
1630 Prison Road
Cottonport, LA 71327