State of Louisiana Versus Antonio Cuza
State of Louisiana Versus Antonio Cuza, No. 24-KH-602 (La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. Jan. 31, 2025).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Parker 711 So. 2d 694
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 24-KH-602
VERSUS FIFTH CIRCUIT
ANTONIO CUZA COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF LOUISIANA
January 31, 2025
Linda Wiseman
First Deputy Clerk
IN RE ANTONIO CUZA
APPLYING FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT,
PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA, DIRECTED TO THE HONORABLE MICHAEL P.
MENTZ, DIVISION "F", NUMBER 15-3977
Panel composed of Judges Marc E. Johnson,
Scott U. Schlegel, and Timothy S. Marcel
WRIT DENIED
Relator, Antonio Cuza, seeks review of the trial court’s October 8, 2024 denial
of his motion to correct an illegal sentence based on lack of subject matter
jurisdiction of an illegal habitual offender. In his motion, Relator challenged his
habitual offender adjudication, arguing that La. R.S. 15:529.1 is unconstitutional
because the statute only enhances the punishment of a crime, instead of charging a
defendant with a crime. In its denial, the trial court found Relator’s argument to be
repetitive and unwarranted.
La. C.Cr.P. art. 882(A) states, “An illegal sentence may be corrected at any
time by the court that imposed the sentence or by an appellate court on review.”
Although La. C.Cr.P. art. 882(A) states that an illegal sentence may be corrected at
any time, a defendant must point to an illegal term in his sentence to raise a claim
cognizable in a motion to correct an illegal sentence. State v. Parker, 98-256 (La.
5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694, 695.
After review, we find that Relator’s motion to correct an illegal sentence was
properly denied. Relator’s motion did not point to a claimed illegal term in his
sentence, but rather he challenged the manner in which the State instituted the
habitual offender proceeding. Therefore, we find that Relator failed to raise a claim
cognizable in a motion to correct an illegal sentence. Consequently, the “at any
time” language of La. C.Cr.P. art. 882 does not apply to his filing, and the
prescriptive period of La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 is applicable, resulting in an untimely
application for post-conviction relief.
Accordingly, the writ application is denied.
Gretna, Louisiana, this 31st day of January, 2025.
MEJ
SUS
TSM
SUSAN M. CHEHARDY CURTIS B. PURSELL
CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT
SUSAN S. BUCHHOLZ
FREDERICKA H. WICKER
CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK
JUDE G. GRAVOIS
MARC E. JOHNSON
STEPHEN J. WINDHORST LINDA M. WISEMAN
JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR.
FIRST DEPUTY CLERK
SCOTT U. SCHLEGEL
TIMOTHY S. MARCEL FIFTH CIRCUIT
MELISSA C. LEDET
JUDGES 101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053)
DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF
POST OFFICE BOX 489
GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054 (504) 376-1400
(504) 376-1498 FAX
www.fifthcircuit.org
NOTICE OF DISPOSITION CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY
I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE DISPOSITION IN THE FOREGOING MATTER HAS BEEN
TRANSMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 4-6 THIS
DAY 01/31/2025 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, THE TRIAL COURT CLERK OF COURT, AND AT LEAST ONE OF
THE COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY, AND TO EACH PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY
COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW:
24-KH-602
E-NOTIFIED
24th Judicial District Court (Clerk)
Honorable Michael P. Mentz (DISTRICT JUDGE)
Thomas J. Butler (Respondent)
MAILED
Antonio Cuza #573882 (Relator)
Rayburn Correctional Center
27268 Highway 21
Angie, LA 70426