Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Barelli v. Gauche, 24 La. Ann. 324.
-
Mulling v. Jones
97 So. 202
La. 1923
Had movers waited until the adjudieatee had paid to the sheriff the amount of his bid, and that amount had been paid over to the seizing creditor, it is certain movers could not have attacked the adjudication without first tendering the amount of the bid ( ), and it may be that had they permitted the adjudicatee not only to pay the price, but also to go into possession of the property they might be estopped from attacking the sale at all (Parson v. Henry, 43 La.