Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ober, Nanson & Co. v. Matthews, 24 La. Ann. 90.
-
Securities Finance Co. v. Phipp
157 So. 747
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
in support of its contention that these additional .interrogatories could be propounded to the garnishee without “formalities of traversing the answers” to the other interrogatories.
-
Mullen v. E. D. Green Realty Co.
147 So. 115
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
1917 [1923], 2243 [2247], This rule of law governing the sale of personal effects has been held to extend to the sale of a promissory note not transferred by endorsement and delivery in the usual mercantile mode, but by a collateral agreement, as was done in this case.” In the case of Ober, Nanson & , the *117 •court said: “By our laws the sale of personal property is perfected by the mere consent of the parties, as between themselves, but it is not perfected as to third parties until delive
-
Holmes & Barnes v. Shawnee Milling Co.
4 La. App. 706
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
Ann. 545 ; Ober, Nanson and Company vs. Matthews, ; Block, Britton and Company vs. Barton, Miller and Company, 27 La.