Cited by

This court sustained the ruling of the trial court, saying: — “ It is no objection to this judgment that a part of the case was left open for trial.” In Conrad vs. Burbank, , the question which the organ of the court stated the case presented was:— “Can a judgment be rendered, on motion, for the amount of the original demand admitted to be due, reserving to plaintiffs the right-to prosecute their demand for the balance?” Answering this the court said:— “This is no longer an open question