Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rice v. AT & T, 614 So. 2d 358.

20 citing documents.

David Chaisson v. Pellerin & Sons, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Rice v. AT & T, (La.App.
Chaisson v. Pellerin & Sons, Inc. 269 So. 3d 868 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Rice v. AT & T , (La.App.
Margaret Gaines v. Pinecrest Supports & Services Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Rice v. AT & T, (La.App.
Calumet GP, LLC v. Garrett 186 So. 3d 712 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Rice v. AT & T, (La.App.
Stuart v. New City Diner 758 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Rice v. AT&T and Travelers Indemnity Insurance Co., , 361 n. 3 (La.App.
Corley v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 737 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Rice v. AT & T, (La.App.
Sterling v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 679 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
See, for example, these cases in which a compensable work accident resulting from the performance of routine tasks has been found, based on evidence of a sudden identifiable *171 event: Rice [v. AT & T, (La.App.
Jones v. AT & T 669 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Rice v. AT & T, (La.App.
McConnell v. City of Ruston 660 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
law, the City contends compensation is legally barred, citing the statutory definition of the term "accident," LRS 23:1021(1), as amended by Acts 1989, No. 454, and this court's interpretation of the amended definition in Rice v. AT & T
Herty v. City of New Orleans 654 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Rice v. AT & T, , on rehearing (La.App.
Barrilleaux v. Dryades Sav. & Loan Ass'n 653 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
3 Cir.1993), writ denied 93-2993 (La.1/28/94), ; Rice v. AT & T, (La.App.
Robin v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 646 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
4th Cir.1993); and Rice v. AT & T and Travelers Insurance Company, (La.App.
Guillory v. Gulf States Utilities 643 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
1st Cir.1992); Rice v. AT & T, (La.App.
Laneaux v. Opelousas Artificial Kidney Center 640 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
”, made the same misinterpretation as the hearing officer in Rice v. AT & T, (La.App.
Guilbeaux v. Martin Mills, Inc. 640 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
App. 1st Cir.1992), Rice v. AT & T and Travelers Insurance Company, (La.App.
Haley v. Beall-Ladymon Corp. 634 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
See also Rice v. AT & T, (La.App.
Schmitt v. City of New Orleans 632 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Similarly in Rice v. AT & T, (La.App.
Borel v. Dynamic Offshore Contractors 626 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
See also, Rice v. AT & T, (La.App.
Richard v. Temple-Inland 625 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
In Rice v. AT & T, (La.App.
Carter v. Smith 620 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
See also Rice v. AT & T, (La.App.