State of Louisiana Versus Frankie Baskin
State of Louisiana Versus Frankie Baskin, No. 25-KH-408 (La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. Sept. 22, 2025).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Parker 711 So. 2d 694
- 234 So. 3d 217 not in our corpus
- State v. Ellison 255 So. 3d 568
- State v. Baskin 188 So. 3d 470
- State v. Baskin 220 So. 3d 741
- 380 So. 3d 570 not in our corpus
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 25-KH-408
VERSUS FIFTH CIRCUIT
FRANKIE BASKIN COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF LOUISIANA
September 22, 2025
Linda Tran
First Deputy Clerk
IN RE FRANKIE BASKIN
APPLYING FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT,
PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA, DIRECTED TO THE HONORABLE FRANK A.
BRINDISI, DIVISION "E", NUMBER 11-4594
Panel composed of Judges Fredericka Homberg Wicker,
Marc E. Johnson, and Stephen J. Windhorst
WRIT DENIED
In this pro se writ application, relator, Frankie Baskin, seeks review of the
trial court’s July 31, 2025 ruling, denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence.
For the following reasons, we find no error in the trial court’s ruling and deny this
writ application.
On July 22, 2025, relator filed a uniform motion to correct an illegal sentence,
alleging that his habitual offender sentence is illegal because his adjudication as a
third-felony offender is erroneous. Relator asserts one of his previous convictions
was improperly used in his habitual offender adjudication. On July 31, 2025, the
trial court denied relator’s motion, finding the motion was repetitive and successive.
The district court also found that relator’s claim was untimely based on the State’s
habitual offender bill of information filed on September 20, 2012 and La. R.S.
15:529.l D(l)(b), which states, in pertinent part: “Any challenge to a previous
conviction which is not made before sentence is imposed may not thereafter be raised
to attack the sentence.”
Although La. C.Cr.P. art. 882(A) provides that an illegal sentence may be
corrected at any time, a defendant must point to an illegal term in his sentence to
raise a claim cognizable in a motion to correct an illegal sentence. State v. Parker,
98-256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694, 695; State v. Ellison, 17-319 (La. App. 5 Cir.
12/13/17), 234 So.3d 217, 223, writ denied, 18-53 (La. 10/29/18), 255 So.3d 568.
When a defendant fails to point to an illegal term in his sentence, he does not raise a
claim cognizable in a motion to correct an illegal sentence. Id. Here, relator does
not point to an illegal term in his sentence; but instead, he contests his adjudication
as a third-felony offender. As a result, relator’s challenge to his sentence is not
cognizable in a motion to correct illegal sentence. Thus, we find no error in the trial
court’s denial of relator’s motion to correct illegal sentence.
In addition, this court has previously reviewed and rejected the issues raised
by relator with respect to his adjudication as a third-felony offender on direct appeal
and in a prior APCR. See State v. Baskin, 15-704 (La. App. 5 Cir. 3/30/16), 188
So.3d 470, 474, writ denied, 16-833 (La. 4/24/17), 220 So.3d 741; see also State v.
Baskin, 23-445 (La. App. 5 Cir. 9/25/23), writ denied, 23-1470 (La. 3/5/24), 380
So.3d 570 (unpublished writ disposition) (providing extensive review of the
procedural history of relator’s habitual offender adjudication). Further, the
Louisiana Supreme Court has also found relator has exhausted his right to collateral
review. State v. Baskin, 25-322 (La. 9/10/25), — So.3d —, 2025 WL 2611597.
Accordingly, we find this writ application is untimely, successive, and
repetitive, and deny this writ.
Gretna, Louisiana, this 22nd day of September, 2025.
SJW
FHW
MEJ
SUSAN M. CHEHARDY CURTIS B. PURSELL
CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT
SUSAN S. BUCHHOLZ
FREDERICKA H. WICKER
CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK
JUDE G. GRAVOIS
MARC E. JOHNSON
STEPHEN J. WINDHORST LINDA M. TRAN
JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR.
FIRST DEPUTY CLERK
SCOTT U. SCHLEGEL
TIMOTHY S. MARCEL FIFTH CIRCUIT
MELISSA C. LEDET
JUDGES 101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053)
DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF
POST OFFICE BOX 489
GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054 (504) 376-1400
(504) 376-1498 FAX
www.fifthcircuit.org
NOTICE OF DISPOSITION CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY
I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE DISPOSITION IN THE FOREGOING MATTER HAS BEEN
TRANSMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 4-6 THIS
DAY 09/22/2025 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, THE TRIAL COURT CLERK OF COURT, AND AT LEAST ONE OF
THE COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY, AND TO EACH PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY
COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW:
25-KH-408
E-NOTIFIED
24th Judicial District Court (Clerk)
Honorable Frank A. Brindisi (DISTRICT JUDGE)
Thomas J. Butler (Respondent)
MAILED
Frankie Baskin #290521 (Relator)
Dixon Correctional Institute
Post Office Box 788
Jackson, LA 70748