State of Louisiana Versus Willie Brown
State of Louisiana Versus Willie Brown, No. 25-KH-419 (La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. Sept. 16, 2025).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- 337 So. 3d 999 not in our corpus
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 25-KH-419
VERSUS FIFTH CIRCUIT
WILLIE BROWN COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF LOUISIANA
September 16, 2025
Susan Buchholz
Chief Deputy Clerk
IN RE WILLIE BROWN
APPLYING FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE FORTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT,
PARISH OF ST JOHN THE BAPTIST, STATE OF LOUISIANA, DIRECTED TO THE HONORABLE KIRK A.
VAUGHN, DIVISION "C", NUMBER 16,11
Panel composed of Judges Susan M. Chehardy,
Marc E. Johnson, and John J. Molaison, Jr.
WRIT DENIED
According to the writ application, the relator, Mr. Brown, pled guilty on
April 3, 2019, and the court sentenced him to 17 years at hard labor. On June 16,
2025, he filed a “Motion To Correct A Plea Of Guilty,” which the trial court
denied as repetitive on the same date. Mr. Brown now seeks review of that
judgment.
For a timely application for a supervisory writ in a criminal case, the
applicant must file the notice of intention to apply for a supervisory writ in the trial
court within thirty days from the ruling at issue. Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal
Rule 4-2, State v. Cepriano, 22-77 (La. App. 5 Cir. 3/30/22), 337 So.3d 999, 1002
(citation omitted). The instant writ application indicates that Mr. Brown filed his
notice of intent on August 4, 2025, more than 30 days after the June 16, 2025,
ruling. Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal Rule 4-3 states:
25-KH-419
In criminal cases, unless the judge orders the ruling to be reduced to
writing, the return date shall not exceed 30 days from the date of the
ruling at issue.
The application is void of any indication that the trial judge ordered its judgment to
be in writing. It also does not appear that the court granted any extensions to file
the writ application. Therefore, the return date was also untimely.
The trial court did not consider the merits of Mr. Brown’s petition but
denied it as repetitive. In his writ application, Mr. Brown provides no argument or
evidence of an error in the trial court’s ruling but instead urges this Court to
consider the merits of his Motion To Correct A Plea Of Guilty. On the showing
made, we find no basis upon which we can grant relief. Accordingly, we deny Mr.
Brown’s writ application.
Gretna, Louisiana, this 16th day of September, 2025.
JJM
SMC
MEJ
2
SUSAN M. CHEHARDY CURTIS B. PURSELL
CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT
SUSAN S. BUCHHOLZ
FREDERICKA H. WICKER
CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK
JUDE G. GRAVOIS
MARC E. JOHNSON
STEPHEN J. WINDHORST LINDA M. TRAN
JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR.
FIRST DEPUTY CLERK
SCOTT U. SCHLEGEL
TIMOTHY S. MARCEL FIFTH CIRCUIT
MELISSA C. LEDET
JUDGES 101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053)
DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF
POST OFFICE BOX 489
GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054 (504) 376-1400
(504) 376-1498 FAX
www.fifthcircuit.org
NOTICE OF DISPOSITION CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY
I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE DISPOSITION IN THE FOREGOING MATTER HAS BEEN
TRANSMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 4-6 THIS
DAY 09/16/2025 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, THE TRIAL COURT CLERK OF COURT, AND AT LEAST ONE OF
THE COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY, AND TO EACH PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY
COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW:
25-KH-419
E-NOTIFIED
40th District Court (Clerk)
Honorable Kirk A. Vaughn (DISTRICT JUDGE)
Bridget A. Dinvaut (Respondent)
MAILED
Willie Brown #744121 (Relator)
Dixon Correctional Institute
Post Office Box 788
Jackson, LA 70748