Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lee, 637 So. 2d 656.

25 citing documents.

State v. Lampley 265 So. 3d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 2d Cir. 5/4/94), , 662, writ denied , 94-1451 (La.
State v. Moore 128 So. 3d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
App.2d Cir.05/04/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/07/94), .
State v. Stephens 114 So. 3d 1265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
40:967(A)(1); State v. Gladney, 29,791 (La.App.2d Cir.9/24/97), ; State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir.5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), .
Distinguished State v. Gibbs 935 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
3d Cir.12/30/05), ; and State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir.5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), .
State of Louisiana v. Sammie Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
2 Cir. 5/4/94), writ denied, 94-1451 (La.
State v. Davis 918 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
2 Cir. 5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), .
State of Louisiana v. Robert S. Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
2 Cir. 5/4/94), writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), the Second Circuit explained that “the rules of Prieur were not meant to be used as additional, technical procedures sacramental to a valid conviction” and noted that substantial compliance with Pri
State v. Willis 915 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
2 Cir. 5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), , the Second Circuit explained that "the rules of Prieur were not meant to be used as additional, technical procedures sacramental to a valid conviction" and noted that substantial compliance with Prieur is all that is required.
State v. Howard 814 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Temple 806 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
2 Cir. 5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), , the *710 Second Circuit explained that "the rules of Prieur were not meant to be used as additional, technical procedures sacramental to a valid conviction" and noted that substantial compliance with Prieur is all that is required.
State v. Alvarez 792 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 5/4/94), , police armed with a warrant for the defendant’s arrest in connection with an armed robbery saw him driving a van fitting the description of a van used in the robbery.
State v. Stanley 780 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
40:967A(1); State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir.05/04/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/07/94), .
State v. Stanley 780 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
40:967A(1); State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir.05/04/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/07/94), .
State v. Thomas 745 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
40:967 A(l); State v. Gladney, supra; State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir.5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), ; (La.App.
State v. Blackwell 701 So. 2d 1389 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir. 5/4/94), .
State v. Gladney 700 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
40:967 A(1); State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir. 05/04/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/07/94), ; (La.App.
State v. Stepp 686 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir. 5/4/94), .
State v. Sturdivant 669 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir. 5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.
State v. Stacy 665 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
App.2d Cir. 5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.
State v. Bailey 664 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
2 Cir. 5/4/94); , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.
State v. Young 660 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
2d Cir. 5/4/94), , writ denied 94-1451 (La.
State v. Cannon 658 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
2d Cir. 5/4/94), , writ denied; State v. Ferrell, 25,851 *733 (La.App.
State v. George 652 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
2d Cir. 05/04/94), ; (La.App.
State v. Mathis 649 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
2d Cir. 05/04/94), ; State v. Ferrell, 25,851 (La.App.
State v. Jacobs 648 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994