Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ford, 643 So. 2d 293.

35 citing documents.

State v. Richie 25 So. 3d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Ford, 26,422 (La.App.2d Cir.9/21/94), .
State v. Marshall 6 So. 3d 1051 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Ford, 26,422 (La.App.2d Cir.9/21/94), ; (La.App.
State v. Williams 972 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Ford, 26,422 (La.App.2d Cir.09/21/94), .
State v. Benton 960 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Birch 956 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Alex v. Rayne Concrete Service 951 So. 2d 138 La. 2007
2 Cir. 9/21/94), , a reverse Batson, [13] gender discrimination case (the defense peremptorily challenged all six white males on the jury venire), [14] the reviewing court stated: As to the third juror, defense counsel offered that it had a "gut feeling, a discomfort," and the court found this was not a neutral explanation.
State of Louisiana v. Timothy E. Robertson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Robertson 931 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Ruiz 931 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Gregory John Ruiz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Desmond Joseph Senegal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
2 Cir. 9/21/94), wherein the courts, relying on Griffith, 479 U.S. 314, applied a new ruling to a case pending on appeal.
State v. Senegal 931 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
2 Cir. 9/21/94), , wherein the courts, relying on Griffith, 479 U.S. 314 , 107 S.Ct.
State v. Persley 918 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
2d Cir.9/21/94), ; (La.App.
State v. Douglas 888 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Ford, 26,422 (La.App.2d Cir. 09/21/94), ; (La.App.
State v. Givens 888 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
2 Cir. 9/21/94), , for the proposition that a subjective *338 evaluation, such as a prosecutor's "gut feeling," is not an adequate and neutral explanation of a strike.
State v. Green 873 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Ford, 26,422 (La.App.2d Cir.9/21/94), ; (La.
State v. White 850 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Wade 832 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
2 Cir. 9/21/94), , and citations therein.
State v. Smith 803 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
14:64.1; State v. Ford, 26,422 (La.App.2d Cir.09/21/94), .
State v. James 754 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Ford, 26,422 (La.App.2d Cir.09/21/94), ; (La.App.
State v. Ball 748 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
2d Cir.), writ denied (1992); State v. Ford , 26,422 [La.App.2d Cir. 9/21/94], .
State v. Ervin 747 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
2d Cir.1993), writ denied, (1994); State v. Ford, 26,422 (La.App.2d Cir.09/21/94), .
State v. Ingram 688 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Moore 687 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
1983); State v. Ford, 26,422 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/21/94), .
State v. Barnes 685 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Ford, 26,422 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/21/94), .
State v. Dugas 683 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Powell 677 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
[1] See, e.g., State v. Davis, 27,961 (La.App.2d Cir. 4/8/96), ; State v. Green, 27,652 (La.App.2d Cir. 1/24/96), ; State v. Wilson, 27,228 (La.App.2d Cir. 8/23/95), ; State v. Toney, 26,711 (La.App.2d Cir. 3/1/95), ; State v. Ford, 26,422 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/21/94), ; writ denied (1994)
State v. Jasper 677 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Ford, 26,422 (La.App.2d Cir. 09/21/94)
State v. Davis 672 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Miller 670 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Green 666 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Wilson 660 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Scott 658 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
2d Cir. 09/21/94), ; State v. Carey, et al, (La.App.
State v. Toney 651 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Ford, 26422, (La.App.2d Cir. 9/21/94), .
State v. Gipson 645 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
App. 2d Cir. 9/21/94), .