Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Vernon v. Wade Correctional Institute, 642 So. 2d 684.

35 citing documents.

Jake Chimento v. Kdm electric/rapides Parish Work Release La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
2 Cir. 8/19/94), discussed the application of La.Code Civ.P.
Chimento v. KDM Electric/Rapides Parish Work Release 229 So. 3d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 2 Cir. 8/19/94), , discussed the application of La.Code Civ.P.
Schexnayder v. Bridges 190 So. 3d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Vernon v. Wade Correctional Institute, 26,053 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/94), ..
Gandhi v. Sonal Furniture & Custom Draperies, L.L.C. 192 So. 3d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Dustin Russell v. H & H Metal Contractors, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Russell v. H & H Metal Contractors, Inc. 65 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Judy Davis v. State, Thru Dotd, Office of Risk Management La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
2 Cir. 8/19/94), “[t]he theory inherent in pretrial procedure is the avoidance of surprise and the allowance of the orderly disposition of the case.” In the present case, where the excluded evidence caused no prejudice and no surprise, the WCJ’s procedural rulings had the opposite effect.
Judy Davis v. Louisiana Dept. of Transportation & Development La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
2 Cir. 8/19/94), “[t]he theory inherent in pretrial procedure is the avoidance of surprise and the allowance of the orderly disposition of the case.” In the present case, where the excluded evidence caused no prejudice and no surprise, the WCJ’s procedural rulings had the opposite effect.
Explained Michael C. Parrish v. Van Tel Communications La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
2 Cir. 8/19/94), (emphasis added), “[t]he theory inherent in pretrial procedure is the avoidance of surprise and the allowance of the orderly disposition of the case.” In Starkman v. Munholland United Methodist Church, 97-661 (La.App.
Explained Parrish v. Van-Tel Communications 967 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
2 Cir. 8/19/94), (emphasis added), "[t]he theory inherent in pretrial procedure is the avoidance of surprise and the allowance of the orderly disposition of the case.
Wilhite v. Thompson 962 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Vernon v. Wade Correctional Institute, 26,053 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/94), ; (La.App.
Hubbard v. Allied Building Stores, Inc. 942 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Vernon v. Wade Correctional Institute, 26,053 (La.App.2d Cir.08/19/94), .
Phyllis Green v. Edwin Spriggs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Vernon v. Wade Correctional Center, 26,053 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/94)
Green v. Spriggs 930 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Vernon v. Wade Correctional Center, 26,053 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/94), .
Waste Mgmt. of La. v. Tadlock Pipe & Equip. 889 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Vernon v. Wade Correctional Center, 26,053 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/94), .
Blackshire v. Washington 880 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Vernon v. Wade Correctional Institute, 26,053 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/94), ; Southern Casing of Louisiana v. Houma Avionics, Inc., XXXX-XXXX, XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
Robinson v. Apria Healthcare, Inc. 874 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Vernon v. Wade Correctional Center, 26,053 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/94), .
Explained Shannon Douglas v. Grey Wolf Drilling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
2 Cir. 8/19/94), (emphasis added), “[t]he theory inherent in pretrial procedure is the avoidance of surprise and the allowance of the orderly disposition of the case.” 6 In Starkman v. Munholland United Methodist Church, 97-661 (La.App.
Explained Douglas v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co. 858 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
2 Cir. 8/19/94), (emphasis added), "[t]he theory inherent in pretrial procedure is the avoidance of surprise and the allowance of the orderly disposition of the case."
Whiddon v. Livingston Parish Council 809 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Netherton Co. v. Scott 784 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Vernon v. Wade Correctional Institute, 26,053 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/94), .
Haws v. Professional Sewer Rehabilitation, Inc. 763 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
McKnight v. General Motors Corp. 750 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Lamb 732 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
See, Aucoin v. State through DOTD, supra ; Vernon v. Wade Correctional Inst., 26,053 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/94), .
Parfait v. Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. 733 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Harvey v. BE & K CONST. 716 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Douglas v. Kitchen Bros. Mfg. 715 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Vernon v. Wade Correctional Institute, 26,053 (La.App.2d Cir. 8/19/94), .
Joyner v. Davison Transport, Inc. 688 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Vernon v. Wade Correctional Institute, 26,053 (La.App.2d Cir. 8/19/94), .
Scott v. Town of Jonesville 676 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
2 Cir. 8/19/94); ; Bradley v. Justiss Oil Co., Inc., (La.App.
Montana v. City of New Orleans 682 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Stockstill v. CF Industries, Inc. 665 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Davis v. Jones Baldwin Music Co. 662 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Vernon v. Wade Correctional Institute, 26,053 (La.App.2d Cir. 8/19/94), .
Thomas v. Gould Street Logging 661 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Allen v. Misco Paper 660 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Vernon v. Wade Correctional Institute, 26,053 (La.App.2d Cir. 08/19/94), .
Roberts v. BE & K CONST. CO. 658 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Vernon *319 v. Wade Correctional Institute, 26,053 (La.App.2d Cir. 08/19/94), .