Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 643 So. 2d 352.

39 citing documents.

  • Tingle v. Page Boiler, Inc. 186 So. 3d 220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    2 Cir. 9/23/94), ; Price v. City of New Orleans, 95-1851 (La.App.
  • Battle v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp. 935 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • Williams v. Saint Gobain Containers 893 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Stobart v. State through Dept. of Transportation & Development, Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 26,165 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/94), .
  • Wilkes v. Ivan Smith Furniture Co. 890 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Stobart v. State through Dept. of Transportation & Development, Graham v. Georgian-Pacific Corp., 26,165 (La.App.2d Cin9/23/94), .
  • Mitchell v. Gaylord Container 889 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    2nd Cir.9/23/94), p. 7, , 358 recognized that a claimant's right to medical benefits is separate and distinct from his right to compensation and that "the claimant may recover medical expenses even though he is no longer entitled to weekly compensation."
  • Howard v. HOLYFIELD CONST., INC. 878 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    23:1221(3)(c)(i); Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 26-165, (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/94), ; Clark v. Bobby L. Clark Trucking, 28, 405 (La.App.2d Cir.6/26/96), .
  • Johnson v. Johnson Controls, Inc. 873 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • Lewis v. CHATEAU D'ARBONNE NURSE CARE CTR. 870 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 26,165 (La.App.2d Cir.09/23/94), .
  • Jones v. Walpole Tire Service, Inc. 867 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Banks, supra; Stobart v. State, Through DOTD, Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation, 26,165 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/94), .
  • Harris v. Casino Magic 865 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • Longoria v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 862 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Brookshire cites Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 26-165 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/94), to support its argument that the testimony of its three specialists (a neurosurgeon and two orthopedic surgeons) is entitled to greater weight than that of Dr. Ledbetter, the treating physician, when the issue concerns the particular field of the specialist.
  • Plater v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 847 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    and Dev., Graham v. Georgia[-]Pacific Corporation, 26,165 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/94), .
  • Davis v. T.A. Miller, Inc. 836 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • Pearce v. Medallion Const. 830 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    and Dev., Graham v. Georgia Pacific Corporation, 26,165 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/94), .
  • Robbins v. Schumpert Medical Center 814 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Plaintiff argues that SEBs are in essence lesser included elements of TTDs and cites Graham v. Georgia Pacific Corporation, 26,165 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/94), , in support thereof.
  • Anthony v. BE & K CONST. 760 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    and Dev., Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 26,165 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/23/94), .
  • Thompson v. Dillard's Dept. Store 759 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    and Dev., Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 26,165 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/94), .
  • Baker v. Libbey Glass, Inc. 759 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 26,165 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/94), .
  • Brister v. Sears Authorized Retail Dealer 753 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    2 Cir. 9/23/94) ; , the second circuit stated that maximum medical improvement is no longer the standard for the termination of temporary total disability benefits.
  • Bolton v. Grant Parish School Bd. 730 So. 2d 882 La. 1999
    5th Cir.6/30/98), ; Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 26-165 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/94)
  • Ward v. Phoenix Operating Co. 729 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Harvey v. BE & K Construction, 30,825 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/98), ; Stevens v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 27,977 (La.App.2d Cir.11/1/95), ; Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 26,165 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/94), .
  • Fisher v. Lincoln Timber Co. 730 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    & Dev., Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 26,165 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/94), .
  • Joseph v. Elmwood Medical Center 715 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • Douglas v. Kitchen Bros. Mfg. 715 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    In Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 26-165 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/23/94), , this court found that penalties may be assessed for nonpayment of compensation unless nonpayment results from conditions over which the employer or insurer has no control or if the employer or his insurer has reasonably controverted the employee's right to such compensation or medical benefits.
  • Transportation Ins. Co. v. Pool 714 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 26-165 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/23/94), .
  • Hill v. Manpower-Collier Investments 712 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    Alexander v. Pellerin Marble & Granite, 93-1698 *564 (La.1/14/94), ; Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 26, 165 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/23/94), .
  • Woods v. Ryan Chevrolet, Inc. 709 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 26-165 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/23/94), .
  • Cleveland v. Delhi Guest Home 694 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    2d Cir. 9/23/94), ; Robichaux v. Terrebonne Parish Sch.
  • Jackson v. Creger Automotive Co., Inc. 691 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    & Dev., Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 26,165 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/23/94), .
  • Deshautelles v. South Central Bell Telephone Co. 694 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    23:1021(10)(a); see Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation, 26,165, p. 16 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/23/94); .
  • Washington v. Lyons Specialty Co. 683 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Danzey v. Evergreen Presbyterian Ministries, 95-167 (La.App.3d Cir. 6/7/95); ; see Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation, 26, 165 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/23/94); ; (La.App.
  • Hagan v. LSU Medical Center 681 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    In Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 26,165 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/23/94), , this court sustained the denial of TTD benefits to an individual who testified that he could not work because of low back pain.
  • Clark v. Clark Trucking 679 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 26,165 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/23/94), .
  • Teel v. Superior Scrap Metals 675 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • Price v. City of New Orleans 672 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    2nd Cir. 9/23/94), p. 7, , 358 recognized that a claimant's right to medical benefits is separate and distinct from his right to compensation and that "the claimant may recover medical expenses even though he is no longer entitled to weekly compensation."
  • Henderson v. New Medico Associates, Inc. 667 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 26,165 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/23/94); .
  • Davis v. Jones Baldwin Music Co. 662 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    23:1201 E; Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 26,165 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/23/94), .
  • Mitchell v. AT & T 660 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • Adams v. City of Shreveport 660 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    2d Cir. 09/23/94), ; (La.App.