Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tarver v. Energy Drilling Co., 645 So. 2d 796.

13 citing documents.

  • Karen Sue Thibodeaux v. Geico Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    2d Cir.1990), writ denied, Tarver v. Energy Drilling Co., 26,233 (La.App.2d Cir.10/26/94)
  • Thibodeaux v. GEICO Cas. Co. 249 So. 3d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    2d Cir.1990), writ denied , ; Tarver v. Energy Drilling Co. , 26,233 (La.App.2d Cir.10/26/94), .
  • Winzer v. Richards 185 So. 3d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    2d Cir.1990), writ denied, Tar ver v. Energy Drilling Co., 26,-233 (La.App.2d Cir.10/26/94), .
  • Black v. Johnson 137 So. 3d 170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    The significance of a per diem was at issue in the context of a workers’ comp proceeding in Tarver v. Energy Drilling Co., 26,233 (La.App.2d Cir.10/26/94), .
  • Morris L. Maynard v. Ricky Hatfield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    2 Cir. 10/26/94); Yates v. Naylor Industrial Services, Inc., (La.App.
  • Maynard v. Hatfield 40 So. 3d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    2 Cir. 10/26/94); ; Yates v. Naylor Industrial Services, Inc., (La.App.
  • Ziegler v. Bagby Construction/LWCC 760 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    App. 2nd Cir. 10/26/94), .
  • Keith v. Gelco Corp. 705 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    Mundy v. Department of Health and Human Resources, supra ; Tarver v. Energy Drilling Co., 26,233 (La.App.2d Cir. 10/26/94), .
  • Bergeron v. Mar-Con, Inc. 705 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    2 Cir. 10/26/94); , plaintiff argues that because Mar-Con interested itself in the transportation of the plaintiff, as an incident to employment, either by contractually providing transportation or reimbursing him for travel expenses, the travel of the plaintiff from his home to the work site falls within the course and scope of his em
  • White v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 685 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    2nd Cir. 10/26/94), , 798 the Second Circuit court noted: As a general rule, accidents which occur while an employee is travelling(sic) to and from work are not considered as having-occurred during the course of employment and are therefore not compensable.
  • Chapman on Behalf of Arvie v. Liberty Mut. Ins. 682 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    App. 2 Cir. 10/26/94); ; Yates v. Naylor Industrial Services, Inc., (La.App.
  • Wilson v. City of Shreveport 682 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • Kennedy v. Martin Gas Transp. Co., Inc. 680 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    2 Cir. 10/26/94), -799 .