Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Birch v. Bates, 22 La. Ann. 198.
-
Reed v. Meaux
292 So. 2d 557
La. 1974
822 (1882) (mortgage absolutely null; fraud; note enforced by holder with notice of nullity); (1870) (no notice to mortgagor who was out of state at time of sale); Farrell v. Klumpp, 13 La.Ann.
-
Cullotta v. Grosz
136 So. 95
La. 1931
115 , , but in these instances, the sales were promptly attacked, and no third person had intervened, nor did any acquiescence by silence or inaction appear.
-
Ring v. Schilkoffsky
104 So. 115
La. 1925
Carrere v. Aucoin, 122 La.
-
Carrere v. Aucoin
47 So. 598
La. 1908
It is possible that notice would he good, if signed by the sheriff, after an order or writ of seizure was in his hands; but until he gets such writ he has no authority to act, and can only serve the notice given him by the clerk.” , a sale under executory process was annulled because the notice was served after the seizure.