Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jackson v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS., 665 So. 2d 661.

14 citing documents.

Oscar Mendoza and Carrie Mendoza v. Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company, the New Orleans Aviation Board, and … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 2 Cir. 12/6/95), ).
Otis Jones v. Whips Electric, Llc., Africk Construction, Llc., Paradise Pools and Spas, Inc., and Trevor Reichman La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Febee Louka v. The Board of Supervisors for the University of Louisiana System d/b/a University of Louisiana at … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Mary Laforge and Wayne Laforge v. Golden Nugget Lake Charles, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
2 Cir. 12/6/95), addressed the propriety of granting summary judgment without prejudice, stating: 7 When summary judgment is proper, the resulting judgment is final, granting a party part or all of the requested relief.
Patricia B. Heaton, Henry F. Heaton and Latter & Blum, Inc. v. Effie Chaisson, Realty Revolution, L.L.C. Dba … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
App. 2 Cir. 12/6/95), the trial court, in granting the summary judgment in favor of insurer, dismissed the action “without prejudice.” On appeal, in granting the insured’s request, in answering the appeal, for amendment of the judgment to reflect dismissal of the claims with prejudice, the Second Circuit explained: Whe
Estate of Blankenship v. Louisiana Home Care Group, Inc. 166 So. 3d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
2d Cir. 12/6/95), , at 664: In its answer to the appeal, State Farm requests that the judgment of the trial court be modified to reflect that the suit is dismissed with prejudice.
Karen Edwards v. Transwestern Publishing, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Edwards v. Transwestern Publishing, LLC 953 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Matthews v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. 959 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
2 Cir. 12/6/95), , in support of its argument that a phone call to a friend during an accident does not make the friend a witness to the accident.
McMath Const. Co., Inc. v. Dupuy 897 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Vega v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 888 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Wheat v. Wheat 868 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
2 Cir. 12/6/95), , the court held that an “independent and disinterested witness” must not be influenced or controlled by others in matters of opinion and conduct and must be unbiased by personal interest or advantage.
Snowden v. Voyager Indemnity Insurance 825 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
2 Cir. 12/6/95), , is factually similar to the case at hand.
Sands v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance 789 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
2 Cir. 12/6/95), , the court used ordinary definitions for the terms “independent” and “disinterested”: Neither the statute nor the insurance policy defines “independent and disinterested witness,” therefore, we will give them their ordinary meanings.