Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jones v. AT & T, 669 So. 2d 696.
-
Bannarta Waggoner v. McDonalds and LUBA Workers Comp
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
App. 2 Cir. 2/28/96), : While the worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge that burden, it will be inadequate where (1) other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker’s version of the incident; or (2) the worker’s testimony is not corroborated by the circumstance
-
Amy Salter v. DeSoto Parish Police Jury and Jean Simpson Personnel Services
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
App. 2 Cir. 2/28/96), : While the worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge that burden, it will be inadequate where (1) other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker’s version of the incident; or (2) the worker’s testimony is not corroborated by the circumstances following the
-
Amos v. Ouachita Parish Police Jury
991 So. 2d 102
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
2d *107 Cir.02/28/96), , just as with an employment accident, the claimant who asserts an occupational disease bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of evidence that an employment-related affliction caused the disability.
-
Foley v. Sportran, City of Shreveport
930 So. 2d 368
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Qualls, supra ; Jones v. AT & T, 28,059 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/99), .
-
Millage v. Builder's Lumber & Supply Co.
877 So. 2d 1171
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
As this court stated in Jones v. A T & T, 28,059 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/96), : While the worker's testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge that burden, it will be inadequate where (1) other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker's version of the incident; or (2) the worker's testimony is not corroborated by the circumstances following the alleged incident....
-
Albert v. Trans Met, Inc.
877 So. 2d 183
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Qualls, supra ; Jones v. AT & T, 28,059 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/99), .
-
Buxton v. Sunland Const.
793 So. 2d 526
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Jones v. AT & T, 28,059 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/96), .
-
Clay v. Delphi Interior & Lighting Systems
775 So. 2d 1207
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Jones v. AT & T, 28,059 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/96), .
- Blanson v. GM Inland Fisher Guide 764 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
- Kelley v. Stone Container Corp. 734 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- Billington v. General Motors Corp. 728 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
-
Qualls v. Stone Container Corp.
699 So. 2d 1137
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Jones v. AT & T, 28,059 (La.App.2d Cir. 2/28/96), .
-
Elliott v. OMSI
693 So. 2d 847
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
2 Cir. 2/28/96); , cited by defendant, where the claimant failed to show by a preponderance that the occupational affliction caused the disability.