Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Smith v. Boothe, 669 So. 2d 682.
-
Miralda v. Gonzalez
160 So. 3d 998
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
2 Cir.5/13/09), ); see also Smith v. Boothe, 28,065, p. 4 (La.App, 2 Cir. 2/28/96), (noting that “a layman may not escape commencement of prescription by asserting that his ability to comprehend and evaluate the facts is limited” and that “[t]his is true despite appellant’s [sic] contention that, as non-lawyers, they could not know their attorney had committed ¡⅞¾ negligent or illegal act.”) Thi
-
STATE, DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES v. Cruz
998 So. 2d 837
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
See Smith v. Boothe, 28,065 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/96), , writ denied, 96-0821 (La.5/10/96), .
-
McGuire v. Mosley Rogers Title Co., LLC
997 So. 2d 23
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
2d Cir.2/28/96), , writ denied, 96-0821 (La.5/10/96), .
-
James v. Tooke
923 So. 2d 922
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Smith v. Boothe, 28,065 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/96), , writ denied, 96-0821 (La.5/10/96), .
-
Atlas Iron and Metal Company v. D. Warren Ashy
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
2 Cir. 2/28/96), writ denied, 96- 0821 (La.
-
Atlas Iron and Metal Co. v. Ashy
918 So. 2d 1205
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
2 Cir. 2/28/96), , writ denied, 96-0821 (La.5/10/96), , which explains: Encountering, by early November 1991, the indicated elements of a malpractice action, the Smiths should have taken practical steps to investigate further and prosecute any such claims against defendants, prior to the running of the prescriptive
-
Tommie's Novelty v. Velasco
868 So. 2d 962
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
URCA Rule 1-3; Smith v. Boothe, 28,065 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/96), .
-
Dauterive Contractors, Inc. v. Landry and Watkins
811 So. 2d 1242
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
2 Cir. 2/28/96); , writ denied, 96-0821 (La.5/10/96); ; Morgan v. Campbell, Campbell & Johnson, 27,390 (La.App.
-
Gladney v. Sneed
742 So. 2d 642
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
2d Cir.1991); Smith v. Boothe, 28,065 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/96), , writ denied 96-0821 (La.5/10/96), .
-
Steed v. ST. PAUL'S UNITED METH. CHURCH
728 So. 2d 931
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
App.2d Cir.2/28/96), , writ denied 96-0821 (La.5/10/96), ; Tichenor v. Roman Catholic Church, 95-0930 (La.App.
-
Ledbetter v. Wheeler
722 So. 2d 382
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Smith v. Boothe, 28,065 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/96), , writ denied, 96-0821 (La.5/10/96), ; (La.App.
-
Allstate Indemnity Co. v. Knighten
705 So. 2d 240
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
URCA Rule 1-3; Smith v. Boothe, 28,065 (La.App.2d Cir. 2/28/96), .
-
Risinger v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.
711 So. 2d 293
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
URCA Rule 1-3; Smith v. Booths, 28,065 (La.App.2d Cir. 2/28/96), .
-
Taussig v. Leithead
689 So. 2d 680
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
2 Cir. 2/28/96); , writ denied, 96-0821 (La.5/10/96); .