DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Wilson, 679 So. 2d 963.

30 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Gladue Joseph Istre A/K/A Joey Istre La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Arijoray Lavon Copeland La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
  • State v. Matthews 200 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    2 Cir. 8/21/96), ; State v. Robinson, 45,820 (La.App.
  • State v. Mitchell 181 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    2d Cir.1993), writ denied, State v. Wilson, 28,-403 (La.App.2d Cir.8/21/96), .
  • State v. Robinson 57 So. 3d 1107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Harris 22 So. 3d 232 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Speed 2 So. 3d 582 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Darnell 988 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Borden 986 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • State v. HEDGSPETH 974 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    [4] See State v. Wilson, 28,403 (La.App.2d Cir.08/21/96), .
  • State v. Newton 973 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Hunter 907 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Divers 889 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Wilson, 28,403 (La.App.2d Cir.8/21/96), .
  • State v. Moore 877 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    P. art. 841; State v. Wilson, 28,403 (La.App.2d Cir.8/21/96), .
  • State v. Willis 823 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Hopson 803 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Goldston 804 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    In State v. Wilson, 28,403 (La.App.2d Cir.8/21/96), , this court dealt with a claim regarding a similar defense motion.
  • State v. Camese 791 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Wilson, 28,403 (La.App.2d Cir.8/21/96), ; State v. Smith, 26,661 (La.App.2d Cir.3/1/95), , writs denied 95-0918 (La.9/15/95), ; 95-0995 (La.1/29/97), ; 95-1598 (La.2/7/97), .
  • State v. Robinson 770 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Maxie, supra, citing State v. Wilson, 28,403 (La.App.2d Cir.8/21/96), ; State v. Smith, 26,661 (La.App.2d Cir.3/1/95), , writs denied, 95-0918 (La.9/15/95), ; 95-0995 (La.1/29/97), ; 95-1598 (La.2/7/97), .
  • State v. Robinson 770 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Maxie, supra , citing State v. Wilson, 28,403 (La.App.2d Cir.8/21/96), ; State v. Smith, 26,661 (La.
  • State v. George 768 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    For support, the state cites several cases including Daubert, supra ; Foret, supra ; and State v. Wilson, 28,403 (La.App.2d Cir.8/21/96), .
  • State v. Baker 720 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    art. 841; State v. Wilson, 28,403 (La.App.2d Cir.8/21/96), .
  • State v. Maxie 719 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Wilson, 28,403 (La.App.2d Cir.8/21/96), ; State v. Smith, 26,661 (La.App.2d Cir.3/1/95), , writs denied 95-0918 (La.9/15/95), ; 95-0995 (La.1/29/97), ; 95-1598 (La.2/7/97), .
  • State v. Picot 718 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    2 Cir. 8/21/96), , wherein the court conducted its own de novo review because it saw “no advantage and a tremendous waste of trial court resources in an appellate court remanding to a trial judge for a ruling on a complete transcript such as the one before us, where the defendant presented no contrary evidence whatsoever.” Id.
  • State v. Evans 715 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    2 Cir. 8/21/96), , because it saw “no advantage and a tremendous waste of trial court resources in an appellate court remanding to a trial judge for a ruling on a complete transcript such as the one before us, where the defendant presented no contrary evidence whatsoever.” Silva , p. 10, 699 So.2d at 492 .
  • State v. Gaines 701 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Silva 699 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    2 Cir. 8/21/96), has taken the identical approach we are taking in this case, and has because of the presumptive error of law, reviewed the transcript of the competency hearing de novo to determine whether the defendant proved by a preponderance of the evidence that he was not competent to proceed to trial.
  • State v. Abbott 697 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    App.2d Cir. 08/21/96), , courts are generally reluctant to order the victims of sex crimes to submit to further examinations.
  • State v. Small 693 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Milligan 685 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    App.2d Cir. 08/21/96), .