Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Broussard v. National Food Stores of La., Inc., 233 So. 2d 599.
-
Holden v. STATE UNIV. MED. CENTER
690 So. 2d 958
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Broussard v. National Food Stores of La., Inc., (La.App.
-
Albritton v. JC Penney Co., Inc.
385 So. 2d 549
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Broussard v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
-
Kavlich v. Kramer
315 So. 2d 282
La. 1975
1st Cir. 1970); McCauley v. Nicholas, supra ; Broussard v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
-
Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
309 So. 2d 697
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
1968); Broussard v. National Food Stores of La., Inc.
-
Chester v. MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY, INC.
311 So. 2d 572
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
(Quotation from Broussard v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Richardson v. Winn-Dixie, Louisiana, Inc.
309 So. 2d 765
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
See the majority and dissenting opinions in Lofton v. Travelers Insurance Company, supra, and Broussard v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
-
Bergeron v. Employers-Commercial Union Companies
306 So. 2d 367
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
3rd Cir. 1972), quoting from Broussard v. National Food Stores of La., Inc., (La.App.
-
Estrade v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
286 So. 2d 686
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
the concurring opinion of Judge Tate in Broussard v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Benoit v. J. Weingarten, Inc.
265 So. 2d 839
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
The general principles of law concerning slip and fall cases when invitees are on the premises of storekeepers is set out in the case of Broussard v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., La.App., , as follows : [1] A store proprietor is not an insurer of the safety of his patrons.
-
Fontanille v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
260 So. 2d 71
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
See, however, Judge Culpepper's dissent in Lofton v. Travelers Insurance Company, supra; the concurring opinion of Judge Tate in Broussard v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Phillips v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Food Stores
256 So. 2d 652
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
3d Cir. 1968) ; the concurring opinion of Judge Tate in Broussard v. National Food Stores of La., Inc., (La.App.
-
Kinard v. Kroger Co.
255 So. 2d 826
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
and by Judge Tate, then of the Third Circuit, in his concurring opinion in Broussard v. National Food Stores of La., Inc.
-
Brown v. Kroger Co.
252 So. 2d 336
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
For examples of these general legal propositions, see Broussard v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., La.App., ; Hay v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, La.App., ; Chauvin v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., La.App., ; Lofton v. Travelers Insurance Co., La.App., ; Sigler v. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Co., La.App., ; Gauthier v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., La.App
- Broussard v. National Food Stores of La., Inc. 246 So. 2d 838 La. 1971
- Baker v. Continental Insurance Co. 244 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971