Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Broussard v. National Food Stores of La., Inc., 233 So. 2d 599.

15 citing documents.

  • Holden v. STATE UNIV. MED. CENTER 690 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    Broussard v. National Food Stores of La., Inc., (La.App.
  • Albritton v. JC Penney Co., Inc. 385 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    Broussard v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
  • Kavlich v. Kramer 315 So. 2d 282 La. 1975
    1st Cir. 1970); McCauley v. Nicholas, supra ; Broussard v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
  • Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 309 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    1968); Broussard v. National Food Stores of La., Inc.
  • Chester v. MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY, INC. 311 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    (Quotation from Broussard v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Richardson v. Winn-Dixie, Louisiana, Inc. 309 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    See the majority and dissenting opinions in Lofton v. Travelers Insurance Company, supra, and Broussard v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
  • Bergeron v. Employers-Commercial Union Companies 306 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    3rd Cir. 1972), quoting from Broussard v. National Food Stores of La., Inc., (La.App.
  • Estrade v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. 286 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    the concurring opinion of Judge Tate in Broussard v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Benoit v. J. Weingarten, Inc. 265 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    The general principles of law concerning slip and fall cases when invitees are on the premises of storekeepers is set out in the case of Broussard v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., La.App., , as follows : [1] A store proprietor is not an insurer of the safety of his patrons.
  • Fontanille v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 260 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
    See, however, Judge Culpepper's dissent in Lofton v. Travelers Insurance Company, supra; the concurring opinion of Judge Tate in Broussard v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Phillips v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Food Stores 256 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    3d Cir. 1968) ; the concurring opinion of Judge Tate in Broussard v. National Food Stores of La., Inc., (La.App.
  • Kinard v. Kroger Co. 255 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    and by Judge Tate, then of the Third Circuit, in his concurring opinion in Broussard v. National Food Stores of La., Inc.
  • Brown v. Kroger Co. 252 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    For examples of these general legal propositions, see Broussard v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., La.App., ; Hay v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, La.App., ; Chauvin v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., La.App., ; Lofton v. Travelers Insurance Co., La.App., ; Sigler v. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Co., La.App., ; Gauthier v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., La.App
  • Broussard v. National Food Stores of La., Inc. 246 So. 2d 838 La. 1971
  • Baker v. Continental Insurance Co. 244 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971