Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Fry v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co., 715 So. 2d 632.
-
Elkins v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.
922 So. 2d 1188
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Co., 30,540 (La.App.2d Cir.6/24/98), , writ denied, 98-1986 (La.10/30/98), , writ denied, 98-2033 (La.10/30/98), ....
- Betty Jean Hargrove v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. Consolidated With Ricky Haley v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- Hargrove v. Missouri Pacific R. Co. 861 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
-
Bader v. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RWY. CO.
834 So. 2d 1
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Co., 30, 540 (La.App.2d Cir.6/24/98), .
-
Lindsay v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
798 So. 2d 976
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
App 2d Cir. 6/24/98), , writ denied 98-1986 (La.10/30/98), , writ denied 98-2033 (La.10/30/98), , a case factually similar to the instant case.
-
Wilkerson v. Kansas City Southern Ry.
772 So. 2d 268
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Co., 30540 (La.App.2d Cir.6/24/98), , this court explained that a railroad crossing is considered unusually dangerous when the view of the motorist is so obstructed as to require that he place himself in a position of peril precariously near the tracks before he has a view of the oncoming train.
-
Kendrick v. Louisiana and North West R. Co.
766 So. 2d 705
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Co., 30,540 (La.App.2d Cir.6/24/98), , writ denied, 98-1986 (La.10/30/98), , writ denied, 98-2033 (La.10/30/98), .
-
Plank v. Town of Rayville
764 So. 2d 1194
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Utilizing the standard set forth by this court in Fry v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co., 30,540 (La.App.2d Cir.6/24/98), , the trial judge first determined that the crossing was not unreason *1201 ably dangerous for an approaching motorist exercising ordinary care and prudence; therefore, the trial judge found no negligence on the part of Rayville as to sight restrictions and signage.
-
Dowell v. STATE EX REL. DOTD
750 So. 2d 498
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Reichert, supra; Fry v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co., 30,540 (La.App.2d Cir.06/24/98), ; (La.
-
Dowell v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development
750 So. 2d 498
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Reichert, supra; Fry v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co., 30,540 (La.App.2d Cir.06/24/98), ; (La.App.
-
Gautreaux v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
757 So. 2d 726
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
2 Cir. 6/24/98); , writs denied, 98-1986, 98-2033 (La.10/30/98); ; .
-
Harper v. Garcia
739 So. 2d 996
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Head v. Head, 30,585 (La.App.2d Cir.05/22/98), ; Fry v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co., 30,548 (La.App.2d Cir.06/24/98), , writs denied, 98-1986 (La.10/30/98), , 98-2033 (La.10/30/98), .
- Palacios v. Louisiana and Delta RR Inc. 740 So. 2d 95 La. 1999
- Moore v. Kansas City Southern R. Co. 722 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
- Jarvis v. Mid-South Rail Corp. 716 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998