Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Zapata v. Cifreo, 26 La. Ann. 87.

2 citing documents.

Davison v. Ernst 163 So. 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
The defendant must aver (which he has not done here) that he has a good defence against the real owner, otherwise whether the plaintiff is the owner or not, is a fact which cannot avail him.” , we find another case in which, again, the language used may be taken as requiring that a defendant in such case as this need only allege that he apprehends that the alleged fictitious transfer of the note *754 may deprive him of an equitable defense which, but for the transfer, he could have urged.
Citizens Discount & Investment Co. v. Brennan 5 La. App. 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Ann. 27 ; Zapata vs. Cifreo, ; Shaw vs. Thompson, 3 Mart.