DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. McKinney, 728 So. 2d 1009.

16 citing documents.

  • State v. Magluilo 256 So. 3d 424 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
  • State v. Sharp 810 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Ratliff 796 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. McKinney, 31,611 (La.App.2d Cir.2/24/99), .
  • State v. Williams 795 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Moreover, after reviewing the trial court’s articulation of reasons and the sentence imposed in accordance with the jurisprudential analysis set forth in State v. McKinney, 31,611 (La.App.2d Cir.02/24/99), , we affirm the sentence.
  • State v. Bowman 794 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. McKinney, 31,611 (La.App.2d Cir.02/24/99), .
  • State v. Hutson 786 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    After reviewing the trial court's articulation of reasons and the sentences imposed in accordance with the jurisprudential analysis set forth in State v. McKinney, 31,611 (La.App.2d Cir.02/24/99), , we affirm the sentences.
  • State v. Stanley 780 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    After reviewing the trial court’s articulation of reasons and the sentence imposed in accordance with the jurisprudential analysis set forth in State v. McKinney, 31,611 (La.App.2d Cir.02/24/99), , we affirm the sentence.
  • State v. Stanley 780 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    After reviewing the trial court's articulation of reasons and the sentence imposed in accordance with the jurisprudential analysis set forth in State v. McKinney, 31,611 (La.App.2d Cir.02/24/99), , we affirm the sentence.
  • State v. Hearold 777 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    However, assuming, arguendo, that this court were to review the sentences for constitutional excessiveness, we would find no error, because a review of the trial court’s articulation of reasons at Hearold’s sentencing hearing shows that the sentence imposed is in accordance with the jurisprudential analysis recently set forth in State v. McKinney, 31,611 (La.App.2d Cir.02/24/99), .
  • State v. Arnold 779 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    After reviewing the trial court's articulation of reasons and the sentences imposed in accordance with the jurisprudential analysis set forth in State v. McKinney, 31,611 (La.App.2d Cir.02/24/99), , we affirm the sentences.
  • State v. Hunter 768 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. McKinney, 31,611 (La.App.2d Cir.02/24/99), .
  • State v. Jones 765 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. McKinney, 31,611 (La.App.2d Cir.02/24/99), .
  • State v. Wall 764 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    After reviewing the trial court's articulation of reasons and the sentence imposed in accordance with the jurisprudential analysis set forth in State v. McKinney, 31,611 (La.App.2d Cir.02/24/99), , we affirm the sentence.
  • State v. Texada 756 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    2 Cir. 2/24/99); , (La.App.
  • State v. Worsham 754 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    After reviewing the trial court's articulation of reasons and the sentence imposed in accordance with the jurisprudential analysis set forth in State v. McKinney, 31,611 (La.App.2d Cir.02/24/99), , we affirm the sentence.
  • State v. Atkins 746 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    In State v. McKinney, 31,611 (La.App.2d Cir.2/24/99), , this court noted that if the state deliberately elicited other crimes testimony, it was imputed to the state and would require a mistrial under La.C.Cr.P.