Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Thorn v. Caskey, 745 So. 2d 653.

25 citing documents.

Robinson v. Wayne & Beverly Papania & Pyrenees Investments, LLC 207 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Campo v. Sternberger 179 So. 3d 908 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
2 Cir. 9/22/99), ; Sowers v. Dixie Shell Homes of Am., Inc., 33,390 (La.App.
Gauthier v. Harmony Construction, LLC 128 So. 3d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
2 Cir. 9/22/99), (Where a home builder abandons construction of the home and fails to fulfill his obligations under the contract, he may be found liable in an action for breach of contract.
Mary P. Ogea v. Travis Merritt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
2 Cir. 9/22/99), where the defendant argued that the plaintiffs failed to meet their burden of proof because the building code relied on by the plaintiffs‟ expert was not introduced at trial.
Ogea v. Merritt 109 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
2 Cir. 9/22/99), , where the defendant argued that the plaintiffs failed to meet their burden of proof because the building code relied on by the plaintiffs’ expert was not introduced at trial.
Won Suk Lee v. Holyfield Construction, Inc. 93 So. 3d 868 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Ledbetter v. Homes by Paige, L.L.C. 110 So. 3d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Cupit v. Hernandez 48 So. 3d 1114 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Thorn v. Caskey, 32,310 (La.App.2d Cir.09/22/99), ; Jenkins Building Supply, Inc. v. Thigpen, 09-0903 (La.App.
Jenkins Building Supply, Inc. v. Thigpen 34 So. 3d 867 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
2 Cir. 9/22/99), (holding that NHWA was not the exclusive remedy available to purchasers in their action against builder based on builder’s failure to complete construction of home, and purchasers could bring breach of contract claim as well as claim under NHWA).
Frank v. Tran 974 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
MELTON FRANK D/B/A FRANK BUILDING AND REMODELING VERSUS BILL TRAN La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Cathy Joseph v. Saturn Construction Co., Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Joseph v. SATURN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. 970 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Barnett v. Watkins 970 So. 2d 1028 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Carter v. Duhe 921 So. 2d 963 La. 2006
Bonomo Builders, Inc. v. AZTEC PAVING & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION CO. 867 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Vintage Contracting v. Dixie Bldg. Material 858 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
See, Thorn v. Caskey, 32310 (La.App.2d Cir.9/2299), ; Joe Banks Drywall & Acoustics, Inc. v. Transcontinental Ins.
Prestridge v. Elliott 847 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
App. 2 Cir. 9/22/99), ; Sowers v. Dixie Shell Homes of Am., Inc., 33,390 (La.App.
Ory v. AVI Const., Inc. 848 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 1/15/02) , , citing Thorn v. Caskey, 32,310 (La.App.2 Cir. 9/22/99), ; Squyres v. Nationwide Housing, 98-8 (La.App.
Stokes v. Oster Development, Inc. 807 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
[7] See e.g. Thorn v. Caskey, 32,310 (La.App.2d Cir.09/22/99), ; Squyres v. Nationwide Housing, 98-8 (La.App.
Craig v. Adams Interiors, Inc. 785 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Dalme v. Blockers Manufactured Homes, Inc. 779 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
2 Cir. 9/22/99) , , recognized that the NHWA was not the exclusive remedy available to purchasers in their action against a builder based on their builder's failure to complete the construction of their home.
Sowers v. Dixie Shell Homes of America, Inc. 762 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
See, e.g., Thorn v. Caskey, 32,310 (La.App.2d Cir.09/22/99), (in addition to construction defects, for which the NHWA was the exclusive remedy, plaintiff complained that the builder did not complete the construction of the house; breach of contract law applied to damages arising from the builder's failure to complete the project); Squyres v. Nationwide Housing, 98-8 (La.App.
Cabahug v. Text Shipping Co., Ltd. 760 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Joe Banks Drywall v. Transcont. Ins. Co. 753 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
App.2d Cir.9/22/99), , wherein a panel of this court held identical language to be unambiguous and, as such, negated coverage for construction defects.