DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Roberie v. Roberie, 749 So. 2d 849.

20 citing documents.

  • Mable Dowden, Et Ux. v. Cassie Catts La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    2 Cir. 12/8/99), ) (alterations in original).
  • Joshua Amos v. Shawana Semien La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    2 Cir. 12/8/99), ) (alterations in original).
  • Margaret Kendrick v. Jody Kendrick La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    2 Cir. 12/8/99), ) (emphasis added).
  • Quinton D. Steele v. Jasmine S. Ashworth La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    2 Cir. 12/8/99), ) (alterations in original).
  • Steele v. Ashworth 151 So. 3d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    2 Cir. 12/8/99), ) (alterations in original).
  • Dwane Link v. Shelley Fritz Link La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    2 Cir. 12/8/99), ) (emphasis added).
  • Link v. Link 139 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    2 Cir. 12/8/99), ) (emphasis added).
  • Kenneth Martin v. Beverly S. Martin, Now Woods La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    2 Cir. 12/8/99), ) (emphasis added).
  • Renee T. Chark v. Steven Chark, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    2 Cir. 12/8/99), (citations omitted), the second circuit explained: 4 A considered decree is one for which evidence as to parental fitness to exercise custody is received by the court.
  • Chark v. Chark 5 So. 3d 1062 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    2 Cir. 12/8/99), (citations omitted), the second circuit explained: A considered decree is one for which evidence as to parental fitness to exercise custody is received by the court.
  • Ketchum v. Ketchum 882 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Roberie v. Roberie, 33,168 (La.App.2d Cir.12/8/99), ; Warlick v. Warlick, 27,389 (La.App.2d Cir.9/29/95), .
  • Brown v. Brown 877 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • Pender v. Pender 890 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    2d Cir. 4/05/02), ; Washkow v. Washkow, 33,965 (La.App.2d Cir.08/23/00), ; Roberie v. Roberie, 33,168 (La.App.2d Cir.12/08/99), .
  • Bourque v. Bourque 870 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • Touchet v. Touchet 836 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • Hoskins v. Hoskins 814 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    2d Cir.1988); Roberie v. Roberie, 33,168 (La.App.2d Cir.12/8/99), ; Washkow v. Washkow, 33,965 (La.
  • Street v. May 803 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    2d Cir.12/8/99), ; In re: Tutorship of M.A.H., supra.
  • Kyle v. Kyle 780 So. 2d 1241 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Lee v. Lee, 34,025 (La.App.2d Cir.8/25/00), , writ denied, 2000-2680 (La.11/13/00), ; Roberie v. Roberie, 33,168 (La.App.2d Cir.12/8/99), ; Shaw v. Shaw, 30,613 (La.
  • Lee v. Lee 766 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • Schuchmann v. Schuchmann 768 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    2 Cir. 12/8/99); , our brethren of the second circuit recounted the law applicable to the case before this court stating: The best interest of the child is the sole criterion to be met in awarding or modifying custody under La.