DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Little, 794 So. 2d 927.

13 citing documents.

  • Succession of Fannie Mae Gibson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    2 Cir. 6/20/01), writ denied, 02-975 (La.
  • David Guillot v. Dolgencorp, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • Guillot v. Dolgencorp, L.L.C. 127 So. 3d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • Eddie Rusk v. Delores Rusk La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    2 Cir. 6/20/01), ), writ denied, 02-975 (La.
  • Rusk v. Rusk 102 So. 3d 193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    2 Cir. 6/20/01), ), writ denied, 02-975 (La.4/26/02), .
  • State, Dotd v. Cole Oil and Tire Co., Inc. 975 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    2d Cir.6/20/01) p. 4, , 930 and cases cited therein.
  • Nestor v. LA. UNIV. HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER 917 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Co. v. Little, 34,760 (La.App.2d Cir.06/20/01), .
  • Alexis Davey Taylor v. Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    art. 103(A) states in pertinent part that an “error may not be predicated upon a ruling which admits or excludes evidence unless a substantial right of the party is affected.” In State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Little, 34,760, p. 6 (La.App 2 Cir. 5/20/01), the court stated: “In reviewing evidentiary decisions of the trial court, an appellate court must consider whether the particular ruling complained of was erroneous and if so, whether the error prejudiced the complainant’s cause,
  • Taylor v. Allstate Insurance Co. 872 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    art. 103(A) states in pertinent part that an “error may not be predicated upon a ruling which admits or excludes evidence unless a substantial right of the party is affected.” In State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Little, 34,760, p. 6 (La.App 2 Cir. 5/20/01), , the court stated: “In reviewing evidentiary decisions of the trial court, an appellate court .must consider whether the particular ruling complained of was erroneous and if so, whether the error prejudiced, the complainant’s ca
  • HOLLY & SMITH ARC., INC. v. St. Helena Congregate Facility 872 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    2 Cir. 6/20/01), -31 (Hearsay evidence was harmless error when non-hearsay evidence found to support judge's finding.).
  • Stelly v. Guidroz 838 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • Lewis v. City of Shreveport 837 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • Greene v. Taylor 809 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002