DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. O'NEAL, 795 So. 2d 1292.

16 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Cedric Charles O'Neal La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
    App. 2 Cir. 10/12/01), writ denied, 01-3207 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Cedric Charles O'Neal La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
    App. 2 Cir. 10/12/01), writ denied, 01-3207 (La.
  • State v. Henderson 110 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    2 Cir. 10/12/01), , writ denied, 2001-3207 (La.11/1/02), .
  • State v. Bobo 77 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    2 Cir. 10/12/01), , a panel from this court was presented with substantially identical facts to those in this case.
  • State v. Calhoun 974 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    2 Cir. 10/12/01), , we discussed a similar factual situation and explained the applicable law: (La.
  • State v. Barrett 963 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Zeigler 945 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    (Emphasis added) The state compares the instant situation to that in State v. Wade, 36,295 (La.App.2d Cir.10/23/02), ; and State v. O'Neal, 34,814 (La.App.2d Cir.10/12/01), .
  • State v. Jones 940 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    In State v. O’Neal, 34,814 (La.App.2d Cir.10/12/01), , in which the defendant urged the same argument (a minute entry |,4s insufficient proof to substantiate a prior plea), this court, relying on State v. Shelton, supra, held the following: We find that the state, through the use of the minute entry, has met its burden of proof under Shelton by showing that the de
  • State v. Davis 937 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    2d Cir.10/12/01), , appeal after new sentencing hearing, 36,431 (La.App.
  • State v. Mead 927 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    2d Cir.10/12/01), , involved a similar factual scenario.
  • State v. Houston 925 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Watson 911 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    2 Cir. 10/21/01), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/1/02), , the defendant appealed his adjudication as a habitual offender, arguing his prior guilty plea should not have been used to enhance his sentence because the state did not introduce the transcript of the prior guilty plea.
  • State v. Warfield 859 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. O'Neal, 34,814 (La.App.2d Cir.10/12/01), .
  • State v. King 856 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    See, State v. Dorthey, supra; State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), ; and State v. O'Neal, 34,814 (La.App.2d Cir.2001), .
  • State v. Neal 830 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    See State v. O'Neal, 34,814 (La.App.2d Cir.10/12/01), .
  • State v. Wade 832 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002