Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Worley v. Worley, 247 So. 2d 254.

13 citing documents.

Ledet v. Ledet 489 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
In support of the argument, counsel for the husband cites cases holding that wives with incomes and/or assets as shown: Assets of $30,000.00, trust principal of $100,000.00, (La.
Palmer v. Palmer 476 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Clooney v. Clooney 446 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Following this rule, (La.App.
Morris v. Morris 426 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Lewis v. Lewis 395 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Bowman v. Bowman 355 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Worley *566 v. Worley, (La.App.
George v. George 347 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Webster v. Webster 308 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
3rd Cir. 1972); (La.App.
Hughes v. Hughes 303 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
the court said: "Our jurisprudence is established that alimony pendente lite, both for the wife and the minor children, terminates with a judgment of divorce, White v. Morris, 236 La.
Vetter v. Vetter 299 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
Manuel v. Broderson 298 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Fellows v. Fellows 267 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
that: Our jurisprudence construing LSA-C.
Latour v. Guilbeau 256 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972