Cited by

5 citing documents.

C & S Safety Systems, Inc. v. SSEM Corp. 843 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
C & S counters that it is a common practice for lessees to take possession and to begin using a budding before construction has been completed, citing Albert K. Newlin, Inc. v. Weingarten’s Markets Realty Co., (La.App.
Southmark Corp. v. Ellis Millwork, Inc. 535 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
3d Cir.1972); Albert K. Newlin, Inc. v. Weingarten’s Markets Realty Co., (La.
J. W. Delahoussaye & Sons, Inc. v. Dardeau 410 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
1st Cir. 1967); Albert K. Newlin, Inc. v. Weingarten’s Markets Real *1254 ty Company, (La.App.
Linzay Downs, Inc. v. R. E. Heidt Construction Co. 397 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Albert K. Newlin, Inc., v. Weingarten’s Markets Realty, (La.App.
Lard Electric Co. v. Miller & Associates Construction Co. 267 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
We believe that this case is controlled by our decision in Albert K. Newlin, Inc. v. Weingarten’s Markets Realty Co., — (which also involved Miller and Associates Construction Company as the prime contractor), in which we stated: “Within the contemplation of the above cited sections of the Revised Statutes, the 60 day period allowed for filing liens begins to run at, or not later than, the time the building is